Bacon’s essays without doubt produce a profound inkling on our minds. They are a fortune of insight into human nature and a storehouse of wisdom and ripe experience. These essays have proved to be one of the world’s epoch-making works.
One can broadly classify Bacon’s essays under three heads:
(1) Essays which concern man in his relations to the world and society, such as Of Great Place, Of Friendship, Of Parents and Children, Of Suitors and Of Seditions and Troubles.
(2) Essays which contend with man in his relations to himself, such as Of Studies, Of Ambition, and Of Revenge.
(3) Essays which contend with man in his relation to his Maker, such as Of Death, Of Unity In Religion, and Of Goodness And Goodness in Nature.
The essays of all these categories constitute a booklet of practical wisdom. It has been said that there has been no more vigorous tonic to wit and intellect. Bacon’s essays enclose inestimable guidelines for human conduct.
The essay, ‘Of Great Place’, for example, proposes the means by which men can rise to high places and warns those, who hold high positions, against the principal vices of authority. This essay contains sound advice for men in high positions.
The essay, ‘Of Studies’, tells us why we should study, how we should study, and what kinds of studies we should pursue.
Bacon’s political essays too, contain a lot of wisdom. The foremost among the essays of this category is ‘Of Seditions and Troubles’, much of which is valid even today.
All these essays divulge an intensity of surveillance, shrewdness of intellect, and breadth of worldly sense. They suggest luminous wisdom, a rational elevation, and a profound knowledge of the human nature.
Bacon impresses us also by the high regard he demonstrates for ethical principles. He highlights the worth of truth: “Certainly it is heaven upon earth to have a man’s mind move in charity, rest in providence, and turn upon the poles of truth” ; and “There is no vice that doth so cover a man with shame as to be found false and perfidious... “
Bacon harshly censures evil: “in place there is licence to do good and evil, whereof the latter is a curse.... But power to do good is the true and lawful end of aspiring.”
He urges people to develop their capacity for goodness and charity: “But in charity there is no excess; neither can angel or man come in danger by it.”
Next, Bacon impresses us by his style. We feel almost daunted by the learning and scholarship that he exhibits in his essays. He makes frequent allusions to historical, biblical, and literary personalities and events. Such allusions come to him unsurprisingly and almost without any labour on his part.
Case in point:
*The essay, Of Truth, contains references to Pilate, Lucian, Lucretius, Montaigne and others.
*The essay, Of Friendship, encloses references to Sulla, Pompey, Julius Caesar, Cicero, Septimius Severus, and more than a few others. Without a doubt, the variety and multiplicity of his illusions are astounding.
He shows an extraordinary command of the aphoristic style. Here are a few gems of thought expressed in a precise, epigrammatic manner
(1) “He that hath wife and children hath given hostages to fortune.”
(2) “Unmarried men are best friends, best masters, best servants, but not always best subjects.”
(3) “It is a strange desire to seek power and to lose liberty or to seek power over others and to lose power over a man’s self.”
(4) “For in evil, the best condition is not to will, the second not to can.”
(5) “Those that want friends to open themselves unto are cannibals of their hearts.”
(6) “Revenge is a kind of wild justice.”
(7) “Men fear death as children fear to go in the dark.”
Coming to Bacon’s exercise of figures of speech, he compares truth to a naked and open daylight which does not show the masques and mummeries and triumphs of the world as half so splendid and beautiful as candle-lights show them. He contrasts deceit to an alloy in a coin of gold or silver. The alloy makes the metal work the better, but it lowers the worth of the metal. In the essay, ‘Of Friendship’, he writes “For a crowd is not company, and faces but a gallery of pictures, and talk but a tinkling cymbal, where there is no love.’
One of the fruits of companionship is compared by him to the pomegranate which is full of many kernels. In the essay, ‘Of Study’, he compares the synopsis of a book to common distilled water which has an unexciting flavour.
But, although Bacon is an amazing man in his essays, he cannot be said to be an appealing persona. Somehow he fails to magnetize us by any personal charm.
#In the first place, there is no personal disclosure in his essays. Essayists like Montaigne and Lamb are engaging predominantly because their essays are full of intimate personal revelations. They relentlessly give us peeps into their own nature, disposition, predilections, and so on. In other words, they establish an undeviating relationship with the reader. Bacon does no such thing. His essays are entirely distant. He talks about the whole world, and all the affairs of men, but never about himself. He never takes us into his sanctum sanatorium.
#Secondly, his essays have evidently been written with worldly success in view. They are empty of any moral idealism; it is the art of success among men that Bacon would have us cultivate. His adages are therefore prudential aphorisms. His wisdom is sophisticated wisdom, and it is even tinged with a certain cynicism. He does not shrivel from methods and devices which are perceptibly Machiavellian. We might even say that his guiding principle is suitability, while morality is a derivative consideration. His essays are the work of an opportunist. He writes an essay on the subject of truth, but approves of deceit because deceit can make truth more persuasive.
In the essay, ‘Of Great Place’, Bacon seems to fall for the use of dishonest techniques for attaining a high position: “All rising to great place is by a winding stair”. He even advises a man to put himself on the stronger side for the accomplishment of his ambition because impartiality will not pay in the initial stages.
In the essay, ‘Of Suitors’, he exposes himself by suggesting that if a patron wants to offer an appointment to the undeserving applicant, he may do so but he should take the precaution of not making any adverse comments on the character of the more deserving candidate. In another essay, he proposes the use of both dissimulation and simulation in order to safeguard confidentiality. He incontestably does not maintain an elevated or an elevating ideal in this essay.
#Finally, Bacon fails to endear himself to us due to his cold-heartedness and his want of sensation. He speaks of wife and children as hostages to fortune and as obstructions to big enterprises. He looks at a wife exclusively from the utilitarian point of view: “Wives are young men’s mistresses, companions for middle age, and old men’s nurses.”
Bacon’s view of camaraderie is utilitarian too. He values amity highly but for the most part for the gains to be obtained from it. His view of love is desolately below par. He calls love the product of folly He would like men never to link love with the solemn affairs and actions of life. He takes a comparatively gloomy view of love, disregarding the value of passion and the inspiration that love often provides.
A mammoth proportion of Bacon’s essays deals either with the ethical qualities of men, or with matters pertaining to the government of states. From the moral point of view, his essays seem to be the work of an opportunist. He admires truth, ethical as well as intellectual. “Clear and round dealing is the honour of man’s nature”, he says in the essay, ‘Of Truth’.
But in the same essay he compares mendacity to an alloy in gold and silver which, though it degrades the metal, makes it work the better.
In the essay, ‘Of Simulation and Dissimulation’, he says that both dissimulation and simulation are pleasing and essential in certain situations. From the moral point of view, Bacon does not aim at an elevated or exalted ideal. His maxims are prudential. He is supportive of a course of action that pays best. He censures slyness, not as a thing despicable and depraved, but as something imprudent.
The essay, ‘Of Friendship’, advocates a functional view of friendship. Bacon values friendship exceedingly, but principally for the fruits to be gathered from it. His conviction in religion, like his conviction in moral principles, is fundamentally prudential. Nor does he attach much importance to emotion and sentiment, as is clear from his essays, ‘Of Parents And Children’, ‘Of Marriage And Single Life’, and ‘Of Love’.
Bacon felt more tranquil in the character of a statesman than in that of a moralist. He shares some of his political attitudes with Machiavelli. Among the weightiest of his essays are those which treat of political issues. Nowhere does his perception show to better advantage than here. The essay, ‘Of Plantations’, contains sound principles. The essay, ‘Of Seditions and Troubles’, is incredibly matter-of-fact in its conduct of the subject.
In the essay, ‘Of the Greatness of Kingdoms and Estates’, he fittingly highlights the magnitude of military and naval power.
As one of the world’s epoch making books, Bacon’s essays have done much to shape and direct the character of many individuals.
But, of course, these essays are not the classified chat of a great author. Bacon is too dignified and his thoughts are too insightful for his essays to be thus regarded. Just here we discover the secret of Bacon’s inadequacy as an essayist to Montaigne or to Lamb.
The ideal essay implies certain nimbleness and simplicity, and a confidential relationship between the author and the reader.
What do we find in them, one might ask !
1) Bacon does not speak of trivialities. He has a taste for splendour and it appears in his treatment of various subjects.
2) In Montaigne and in Lamb, ‘subject’ is often unimportant, but is treated with feeling. In Bacon, the subject is always important and however unsystematic he may be in his treatment of it, he never wanders from its boundaries.
3) When he speaks of “masques and triumphs” (which he calls “toys”), he discusses them at nearly as great length, and with as strict an adherence to the theme, as when discussing truth or death or revenge or atheism.
The essays of Bacon are perhaps more important from the literary or the stylistic point of view. In writing his essays, Bacon did more than initiate a new literary form. He took one of the lengthiest steps ever taken in the expansion of an English prose style. It was a step which set that style upon the road which it travelled to the times of Addison and Swift. English prose was already, before Bacon, or autonomously of him, affluent and resonant.
Hooker, the last book of whose great masterpiece was published in the same year with Bacon’s earliest essays, still ranks as one of the greatest stylists in English. So does Sir Walter Raleigh who had written several things before that date. Both Hooker and Raleigh indisputably have magnificence and potency. But it cannot be said that they were masters of a style suited for all the purposes of prose. Bacon developed a style which, though not quite lithe and contemporary, was unparalleled for the elevated communication of thought.
Though a devoted Latinist and using a decidedly Latinized vocabulary, he saw that the vastness of English prose was being written in wobbly sentences of colossal length, and he discovered the value of petite, brusque, and firmly-knit sentences, unfamiliar in English. He rejected the complacency and congested imagery of the euphuists, but knew how to illumine his thought with well-placed figures, and to give to it a creative radiance and charisma.
Bacon’s essays have become a classic of the English language and they owe this position, not to their theme but to their style. Brevity of expression and epigrammatic succinctness are the most discernible attributes of this style.
Bacon possessed the authority of compressing into a few words a great body of thought. This concision of style is often attained by the evading of superfluous epithets and by the oversight of the ordinary joints and sinews of speech, such as conjunctions and other logical connections. Yet it is seldom carried to the length of obscurity, and Bacon’s pithiness is matched only by his articulacy and unambiguousness.
Bacon’s essays are also intermingled with quotations from an assortment of sources, particularly with quotations from Latin authors. His style impresses us by its epigrammatic quality and its use of vibrant figures of speech.
He shows himself to be a master of the thick, terse mariner of writing. No one has ever produced a greater number of closely packed and striking formulas, loaded with matter-of-fact astuteness. Many of them have become current as proverbs.
A classic in its own right!!