Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Return to Nature? An Ecological Counterhistory

Rate this book
Sustainability has become a compelling topic of domestic and international debate as the world searches for effective solutions to accumulating ecological problems. In Return to Nature? An Ecological Counterhistory, Fred Dallmayr demonstrates how nature has been marginalized, colonized, and abused in the modern era. Although nature was regarded as a matrix that encompassed all beings in premodern and classical thought, modern Western thinkers tend to disregard this original unity, essentially exiling nature from human life. By means of a philosophical counterhistory leading from Spinoza to Dewey and beyond, the book traces successive efforts to correct this tendency. Grounding his writing in a holistic relationism that reconnects humanity with ecology, Dallmayr pleads for the reintroduction of nature into contemporary philosophical discussion and sociopolitical practice. Return to Nature? unites learning, intelligence, sensibility, and moral passion to offer a multifaceted history of philosophy with regard to our place in the natural world. Dallmayr's visionary writings provide an informed foundation for environmental policy and represent an impassioned call to reclaim nature in our everyday lives.

216 pages, ebook

First published August 24, 2011

16 people want to read

About the author

Fred R. Dallmayr

47 books7 followers
Fred Reinhard Dallmayr is an American philosopher and political theorist. He is Packey J. Dee Professor Emeritus in Political Science with a joint appointment in Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
2 (66%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
1 (33%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Tom Baikin-O'hayon.
236 reviews25 followers
December 6, 2018
although overall the book is interesting and vast in scope, it seems like it could use better editing. many of the points the book is trying to make seem to disappear and chapters seem to follow one another without proper connections.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.