Actual rating: 2.75. I rounded up to 3, because I admire the author's writing and I know it's hard to make it as a self-pubbed author. My dissatisfaction has wholly to do with her main characters in this installment.
Ehhh... very early on I could already tell I wasn't going to like this book as much as I did the first (even though I really wanted to). I prefer my romances to have power balanced on both sides, and from the outset it was apparent that one person is holding all the cards and the other doesn't even know they're in a gamehouse.
Aysel is one of those fiesty, tiny, sassy, tiny, fierce, and... did I say tiny? Anyway, Aysel is one of those pocket-sized fire-spitting no-man-had-ever-met-a-woman-like-her heroines who wears plot armour so thick it's so hard to root for her because you know that the powers-that-be have already determined she will win at everything. She's supposed to be a wallflower, a shadow, someone whom others won't notice, and yet that's not shown at all by the story. Instead, she attracts so much attention by being unable to keep a smart retort to herself and threatening any man who so much as breathes wrong in her direction.
For this reason, my sympathies went immediately to Bashir, especially knowing his rags-to-commander backstory; unfortunately, the poor man is a brick.
"Criminals were criminals in Bashir's mind, whether they were the lowliest of pickpockets or the most sophisticated of court spies."
And
"She was a puzzle, and Bashir hated puzzles. He'd rather cut something in half or smash it to pieces than fiddle with bits to make a whole."
The guy has no sense of nuance nor critical-thinking abilities. Characters were spelling out his enormous lapse in judgment in treating Aysel as a criminal, and it was only past the halfway mark when he finally accepted that he'd been wrong to treat her as such. No. Critical-thinking. Abilities. This was incredibly frustrating because I was much more sympathetic to his plight than I was with Aysel's. Bashir was juggling bigger and bigger expectations in increasingly narrow spaces, much like Naime was in the first book. Except Naime was brilliant and wily, and could come up with ways to navigate herself into a better position. Bashir had no such advantage, and ended up humiliating himself over and over again.
What really attracted me to Naime and Makram from Reign and Ruin was that they were both clever in different ways, and because they had mutual admiration for each other, the romance that bloomed out of that was very believable. In contrast, I had absolutely no clue what serves as the foundation for Bashir and Aysel's romance other than mere physical attraction. Which doesn't really cut it for me. Aysel thinks Bashir is an insufferable idiot who holds her back (which he is and he does). Meanwhile, Bashir is constantly losing his temper and dignity, played like a fool by Aysel. I wholly disagree with Erol who says that Aysel is perfect for Bashir because he needs someone who makes his life fun. No, what the man needs is sleep, anger management and meditation; someone please hook him up with a Buddhist monk.
I suppose my biggest frustration is the humongous chasm between how these characters are described and how the story actually shows them. Aysel was supposed to be a little wee slip of a thing who escapes notice, and Bashir was supposed to be a steady, dependable force worthy of respect. Instead, we get a firecracker who must absolutely push people's buttons because that's apparently how you stay out of the limelight, and a military commander who apparently got the top scores in University but has no head for planning and strategy.