This was one of those books that I saw in an article, bought on impulse, and read immediately to clear off my desk. My initial curiosity was piqued by the fact that a human being could a) drill a hole in his own head and b) live. Quite well, from the sounds of it. Mellen is almost five decades into his auto-trepanation experiment and still enjoying sentience. I had to know more.
As it turns out, yes, it is possible to penetrate about an inch into your skull and not kill yourself. Unfortunately, the book is largely uninterested with the gore, and the actual process, of trepanation. Mellen doesn't include a diagram or instruction sequence where he describes how his operation was undertaken. His writing, limpid and airy elsewhere, stayed that way during the part where he casually drilled a fucking hole in his head with a hand screw. I wanted more of a report of the operation. I wanted to know how he dealt with the pain. Instead, he describes simply cutting a flap of skin and getting down to a-drillin.'
Of course, blood and guts are not what he's here for. He didn't write a book to be lurid and exploit his crazy operation. The text, in other words, does not live up to Amanda Feilding's medieval cover illustration. He wrote it to proselytize the supposed genius of his friend, onetime mentor, and later estranged guru Bart Hughes.
The theory that Hughes invented was essentially that increasing blood flow to the brain was the key to enlightenment. The idea was this: one externality that resulted from man evolving into his upright position was that the brain got further from the heart and gravity pulled blood out of the brain. Since blood flow is essential to the functioning of every organ, if one could only get more "brainbloodvolume" into the skull, one got high. LSD achieved this: it constricted the capillaries in the brain and kept the blood floating around in there or something. Standing on one's head achieved this. Another way to achieve it was to relieve pressure on the fluid in the brain by drilling a hole in the skull. That way, the heartbeat could express itself more freely, as happens in the fontanels of a child, whose skull hasn't sutured together solidly yet.
Read the book if you want more detail than that, but to avoid rehashing a lot of witch-doctor babble, it's all bullshit. It has to be. I doubt that LSD is pharmacologically identical to standing on your head. He makes no mention of the chemicals in hallucinogens, as far as I remember. It's all just a matter of vasoconstriction. I'm no doctor, but neurology has to be a lot more complicated than how much glucose your body sends to your brain's capillaries. The theory is a waste of time to ponder.
The bankrupt medical explanations don't make the book bad by any means. It is useful as a fascinating glimpse into the mind of a real, drugged-out 60s eccentric. That was my chief takeaway. You know, you read a book about The Beatles or Keith Richards and you're dipped into a totally foreign (to a millennial) world of crazy, wonderful characters living in anarchy. Everything seems like one big carnival. And you wonder what it was like for those people to be so wigged out. This book is a dispatch from that fringe. I don't think Joe Mellen was clinically insane, but his theory is stupid enough to at least betray a lack of critical faculty.
That's why I read Bore Hole somewhat lamenting the loss of cultural innocence. This book is about a time when being a run-of-the-mill stoner was a novel enough identity to convince a guy that he wasn't just indulging chemical pleasures, but actually approaching ontological breakthroughs. I mean based on experience I'm totally on board with the idea that drugs can unveil one's noosphere and even reality's mechanisms. But from those experiences, I know that the underlying disquiet that disposes every psychedelic discovery is the immutability of our physical form. The totality of our entrapment. Within these mortal containers, we're subject to the materials we are made of and the materials we put inside ourselves. Drugs may lead to a state of mind in which the lens gets ripped off, so to speak, but they're also knowable and predictable as chemicals. Mellen and Hughes equate LSD with trepanation with a return to childhood, contravening nature; it's kind of a "return to purity" type thing. And that's just bullshit. Drugs are chemicals that act on our brains. Actually it's funny that he sought a regression to childish thinking given how naive his adult thinking was.
A far more compelling mystical explanation of LSD comes from an anecdote I heard about Ram Dass. Supposedly he once gave acid to an Indian guru to see if he, too, could make something of the incredible revelations Ram had seen. The guru experienced no effect. He took another dose, and still nothing. Eventually the guru concluded that he had no use for LSD; that the universe reveals itself to every culture through an avatar it feels comfortable with, and that for our materialist culture that messenger is a chemical. Since he had already seen what the drug had to show, he felt no effect.
Compared to a genuinely interesting explanation like that (not to mention plausible, as far as these things go) this book didn't measure up. It was peculiar, but not convincing. I found it to be a raw primary source: a first-person account that would have to be combined with a more explanatory text in order to convey a full story. A text like that would have described the history of trepanation; the ordeal of manual auto-trepanation; whether there were any contemporaneous ill effects from eating ton after ton of shitty processed sugar. (Seriously, this dude is constantly consuming sugar. Reminded me of the John Travolta movie Michael. Mellen does say that later in life he developed Type II diabetes, but he calls it a congenital illness. No attribution goes to the fact that he ate processed sugar many times a day for years. Goes to show what kind of medical brilliance you're dealing with.) Mostly, it would involve what the people around him could have possibly thought of this crazy guy and his crazy crew.
As I picked up Bore Hole, I was intrigued to see the back cover say that some called this book a brilliant, humanistic vision, while others "denounced" it as a cautionary tragedy of drug use. I was curious how such a soaring concept could be at the same time a sad, self-unaware dud. After reading it, I see both sides. This story is about vigorous and passionate devotion to life, but also to an idea that holds no water. His life is wild and free, but at some point you're just zonked out on acid all the time. Sure enough, the theory he expounds is exactly what you'd expect a couple of fried brains to dream up.