What do you think?
Rate this book
An Age of Transition?: Economy and Society in England in the Later Middle Ages
Christopher Dyer examines the transition in the economy and society of England between 1250 and 1550. Using new sources of evidence, he demonstrates that important structural changes after 1350 built on the commercial growth of the thirteenth century. He shows that development of individual property, response to new consumption patterns, and use of credit and investment, came from the peasantry rather than the aristocracy. An Age of Transition? , a significant new work by a top medievalist, reveals how England was set on course to become the 'first industrial nation'.
Paperback
First published February 3, 2005
4 people are currently reading
43 people want to read
About the author
Christopher Dyer
66 books10 followersChristopher Charles Dyer CBE FBA (born 1944) is Leverhulme Emeritus Professor of Regional and Local History and director of the Centre for English Local History at the University of Leicester. He was appointed Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) in the 2008 Birthday Honours.
Dyer is well known as the historian of everyday life, a recurring theme in his publications. Dyer looks at the economic and social history of medieval life, with an emphasis on the English Midlands from the Saxon period through to the 16th century. He was invited to deliver the Ford Lectures in the University of Oxford in a lecture series entitled 'An Age of Transition? Economy and Society in England in the Later Middle Ages'.
Dyer is well known as the historian of everyday life, a recurring theme in his publications. Dyer looks at the economic and social history of medieval life, with an emphasis on the English Midlands from the Saxon period through to the 16th century. He was invited to deliver the Ford Lectures in the University of Oxford in a lecture series entitled 'An Age of Transition? Economy and Society in England in the Later Middle Ages'.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Read
February 11, 2026Academic historians really don't care about entertaining you lol. But once I got used to the writing, I had to admit that it was pretty important background info for my studies.
Wrote this for my independent study:
In An Age of Transition, Christopher Dyer convincingly argues that the reputation of the later Middle Ages as simply a period of economic decline is a misleading generalization. He remarks that the early scholarship that made this point primarily, and perhaps only, looked at the relative abundance of estate records of the aristocracy and church institutions. This created an overwhelming picture of decaying rents and buildings, and declining wealth within England from the perspectives of the most wealthy members of society. By examining new sources such as wills, Dyer assesses how previously underrepresented classes of people, such as rural entrepreneurs, middlemen, farmers, and graziers like gentlemen and yeomen, clergy who lent money, servants, artisans, etc. contributed to the economy of late medieval England. He pinpoints how these groups helped instigate several processes of innovation, such as technological advances in farming, the rise of wage labor, and the expansion of non-agricultural employment. As a result, Dyer states that this period should not be seen as a dismal pre-modern prelude that stands in stark contrast to the industrial revolution of the later seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but a world in which gradual structural changes that were hard-won by various classes of people laid the groundwork for the future.
Dyer’s first chapter, “A New Middle Ages,” expounds upon how the twelfth and thirteenth centuries laid the foundations of the economy that would proceed to weather the storms of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, like the continuing rise of urbanization, commercialization, and transportation development. While the aristocracy would lose a lot of money and social control in the later Middle Ages, certain entrepreneurial individuals were able to sustain and even prosper within the system. Dyer also emphasizes how the prevailing belief that the elite class directed change from above, as might be suggested by estate records, is largely incorrect, as peasants were as entrepreneurial as gentry and urban middle classes in the late fifteenth century.
The rest of the book provides an overview of the different transitions that occurred within the economy. The second goes over the shifting boundaries between private and public property and communal welfare, and how peasants themselves sought for the privatizing measure of “enclosing” common fields. Parish life continued to flourish, despite many individuals migrating, and family bonds loosening as a result of individual self-interest. The third chapter explores the relationship between authority and freedom as magnates turn away from village management and direct demesne farming, which is no longer a lucrative venture with a decreasing rural population. Before the government eventually steps in the magnates’ position, Dyer articulates that the peasants experience a period of freedom, as seen by economic innovations and migration. Later he emphasizes that as a result, peasants developed a work ethic often ascribed to Protestantism as early as 1450.
The fourth chapter delves into consumption and investment patterns in late medieval England, providing a brief survey of artifacts and structures to prove that consumerism began well before the eighteenth century. Dyer discusses how consumption changed radically after the plague, with food and clothing products becoming cheaper and more accessible for a significantly smaller population. The notion of fashion trends develops at this time, with stores advertising clothing to create demand. The fifth chapter then expands on the theme of consumption while assessing the relationship between subsistence and markets. He states that though the economic activity evidently lessened during this period, opportunities still remain available for many people like farmers, artisans, and wage-earners, who could easily defy sumptuary laws and buy, eat, and dress like nobles. Lastly, in the sixth chapter on work and leisure, Dyer claims that hard work became an important value across social classes, with elite members claiming that alms should only be handed to the “deserving poor.” This makes sense from the employer’s standpoint, as they want the most value out of every person during a labor shortage. The same mentality around work can also be observed among peasants themselves though, who equate industriousness with better opportunities in the future.
Overall, this book is an enlightening examination of socio-economic developments within the later Middle Ages, effectively challenging the notion that this period was “dark” and dismal, and should stand in opposition to what came after. In his conclusion, Dyer persuasively argues against viewing 1500 as a sharp turning point, not only because of the compelling evidence he presents but also because it is almost always problematic to imagine any society and its economy turning on a dime without any antecedents. Instead, Dyer demonstrates that by consulting additional and lesser-known sources, we can develop a more nuanced understanding of how societal values gradually evolved, ultimately paving the way for later revolutions.
Wrote this for my independent study:
In An Age of Transition, Christopher Dyer convincingly argues that the reputation of the later Middle Ages as simply a period of economic decline is a misleading generalization. He remarks that the early scholarship that made this point primarily, and perhaps only, looked at the relative abundance of estate records of the aristocracy and church institutions. This created an overwhelming picture of decaying rents and buildings, and declining wealth within England from the perspectives of the most wealthy members of society. By examining new sources such as wills, Dyer assesses how previously underrepresented classes of people, such as rural entrepreneurs, middlemen, farmers, and graziers like gentlemen and yeomen, clergy who lent money, servants, artisans, etc. contributed to the economy of late medieval England. He pinpoints how these groups helped instigate several processes of innovation, such as technological advances in farming, the rise of wage labor, and the expansion of non-agricultural employment. As a result, Dyer states that this period should not be seen as a dismal pre-modern prelude that stands in stark contrast to the industrial revolution of the later seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but a world in which gradual structural changes that were hard-won by various classes of people laid the groundwork for the future.
Dyer’s first chapter, “A New Middle Ages,” expounds upon how the twelfth and thirteenth centuries laid the foundations of the economy that would proceed to weather the storms of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, like the continuing rise of urbanization, commercialization, and transportation development. While the aristocracy would lose a lot of money and social control in the later Middle Ages, certain entrepreneurial individuals were able to sustain and even prosper within the system. Dyer also emphasizes how the prevailing belief that the elite class directed change from above, as might be suggested by estate records, is largely incorrect, as peasants were as entrepreneurial as gentry and urban middle classes in the late fifteenth century.
The rest of the book provides an overview of the different transitions that occurred within the economy. The second goes over the shifting boundaries between private and public property and communal welfare, and how peasants themselves sought for the privatizing measure of “enclosing” common fields. Parish life continued to flourish, despite many individuals migrating, and family bonds loosening as a result of individual self-interest. The third chapter explores the relationship between authority and freedom as magnates turn away from village management and direct demesne farming, which is no longer a lucrative venture with a decreasing rural population. Before the government eventually steps in the magnates’ position, Dyer articulates that the peasants experience a period of freedom, as seen by economic innovations and migration. Later he emphasizes that as a result, peasants developed a work ethic often ascribed to Protestantism as early as 1450.
The fourth chapter delves into consumption and investment patterns in late medieval England, providing a brief survey of artifacts and structures to prove that consumerism began well before the eighteenth century. Dyer discusses how consumption changed radically after the plague, with food and clothing products becoming cheaper and more accessible for a significantly smaller population. The notion of fashion trends develops at this time, with stores advertising clothing to create demand. The fifth chapter then expands on the theme of consumption while assessing the relationship between subsistence and markets. He states that though the economic activity evidently lessened during this period, opportunities still remain available for many people like farmers, artisans, and wage-earners, who could easily defy sumptuary laws and buy, eat, and dress like nobles. Lastly, in the sixth chapter on work and leisure, Dyer claims that hard work became an important value across social classes, with elite members claiming that alms should only be handed to the “deserving poor.” This makes sense from the employer’s standpoint, as they want the most value out of every person during a labor shortage. The same mentality around work can also be observed among peasants themselves though, who equate industriousness with better opportunities in the future.
Overall, this book is an enlightening examination of socio-economic developments within the later Middle Ages, effectively challenging the notion that this period was “dark” and dismal, and should stand in opposition to what came after. In his conclusion, Dyer persuasively argues against viewing 1500 as a sharp turning point, not only because of the compelling evidence he presents but also because it is almost always problematic to imagine any society and its economy turning on a dime without any antecedents. Instead, Dyer demonstrates that by consulting additional and lesser-known sources, we can develop a more nuanced understanding of how societal values gradually evolved, ultimately paving the way for later revolutions.
Displaying 1 of 1 review