This is a lavishly detailed book that suffers from poor to nonexistent organization. (As the acknowledgments credit an editor for pruning "over a third of the original manuscript", I can't imagine what this tome was like originally.) This book would benefit from a lot more editing. Besides following a basic timeline of the production and consumption of coffee over the years, focusing on the mid-1800's to the present, there is zero narrative thread. Each subheading leaps between subjects haphazardly. The entire book reads like a collection of chronologically arranged index cards. It was a struggle to slog through.
Despite this, the information is still fascinating. It covers the social and political ramifications of the coffee crop in Latin America, the rise and fall of brands as tastes in America developed and changed, the impact of advertising, the roll of speculation, industry infighting, climate change... It sounds like an exhaustive list, but even though the subtitle promises "The History of Coffee and How it Transformed the World", his research primarily focuses on America. Asides about other countries are brief and perfunctory.
All in all, a flawed but educational read.
Notes
The strongest blast against the London coffeehouses came from women, who unlike their Continental counterparts were excluded from their all-male society (unless they were the proprietors). In 1674 The Women’s Petition Against Coffee complained, “We find of late a very sensible Decay of that true Old English Vigour… Never did Men wear greater Breeches, or carry less in them of any Mettle whatsoever.” This condition was all due to “the Excessive use of that Newfangled, Abominable, Heathenish Liquor called Coffee, which… has so Ennucht our Husbands, and Crippled our more kind gallants… They come from it with nothing moist but their snotty Noses, nothing stiffe but their Joints, nor standing but their Ears.”
The Women’s Petition revealed that a typical male day involved spending the morning in a tavern “till every one of them is as Drunk as a Drum, and then back again to the Coffee-house to drink themselves sober.” Then they were off to the tavern again, only to “stagger back to Soberize themselves with Coffee.” In response, the men defended their beverage. Far from rendering them impotent, “[coffee] makes the erection more Vigorous, the Ejaculation more full, adds a spiritualescency to the Sperme.” (Pg. 13)
Most coffee roasters struggled to understand new marking methods. They observed, for instance, that milk sales went up at a Boston sales counter when the drink was poured by a sexy young woman… Yet few coffee ads attempted any form of sex appeal for the traditional, dignified beverage. One that did, albeit in an awkward, school-boyish fashion, was widely criticized. A 1912 ad for Satisfaction Coffee depicted a can with female legs fleeing from a pursuing male. “Worth running after any time,” read the text. “Always pure. Never sold in bulk.” This ad was, noted a trade journal, “in questionable taste.” (Pg. 115)
Five year later Dr. Hugo Muensterberg, a Harvard psychology professor, lectured on the topic “Applying Psychology to Business.” He made extraordinary—and frightening—claims. “Business men will eventually realize that customers are merely bundles of mental states and that the mind is a mechanism that we can affect with the same exactitude with which we control a machine in a factory.” (Pg. 115-116)
Resor quoted the philosopher-psychologist William James: “Our judgments concerning the worth of things, big or little, depend on the feelings the things arouse in use.” (Pg. 128)
A surprising number of early copywriters with a religious background were attracted to the secular advertising pulpit. “Business had had become almost the national religion of America,” Frederick Lewis Allen observed in Only Yesterday, his classic book on the twenties. “So frequent was the use of the Bible to point the lessons of business and of business to point the lessons of the Bible that it was sometimes difficult to determine which was supposed to gain the most from the association.”
*John Watson was not the only one who made such observations. In 1922 the novelist Sinclair Lewis created George Babbitt, the quintessential American consumer for whom “standard advertised wares… were his symbols and proofs of excellence; at first the signs, then the substitutes, for joy and passion and wisdom.” Every morning the insecure Babbit “gulped a cup of coffee in the hope of pacifying his stomach and his soul.” (Pg. 156)
“Coffee may be advertised just as coffee—a drink which pleases the palate,” wrote James Webb Young in a company memo. “[But] we know that beauty, romance and social prestige mean more than almost anything to a woman,” he continued. “The outstanding modern hotels are considered absolute arbiters of correct social usage, particularly with regards to foods.” (Pg. 157)
The life of the Depression-era housewife clearly was not easy. On a popular 1932 radio show one commentator advised housewives to “keep a good big supply of coffee in the pantry. You'll find it something to cling to… Otherwise, the day will surely come when you'll sit down in the middle of the kitchen floor and scream and yell at the ghastly damnable futility of it all. (Pg. 186)
During the rationing period, poet Phyllis McGinley penned an eloquent lament in which she spoke of the “riches my life used to boast”:
Two cups of coffee to drink with my toast,
The dear morning coffee,
The soul-stirring coffee,
The plenteous coffee
I took with my toast.
(Pg. 204)
It also introduced the absurd slogan, “Flavor so unbeatable, it's reheatable!” (Pg.259)
“I couldn't understand why in the richest country in the world they were drinking such poor quality coffee.” The public didn't seem to care. “People drank ten cups of that stuff a day. You knew it had to be weak. If you drink ten cups of strong coffee, you'd be floating against the ceiling.” (pg. 266)
“Coffee has no nutritional value. For these peasants it is worth only as much as it can buy in food and clothing. And because it buys so little, it is a bitter brew, the taste of poverty and human suffering.” Penny Lernoux in The Nation. (Pg. 271)
Caffeine is one of the alkaloids: organic (carbon-containing) compounds built around rings of nitrogen atoms. Alkaloids are the pharmacologically active chemicals produced by many tropical plants. Because they have no winter to provide relief from predators, tropical plants have evolved sophisticated methods to protect themselves. In other words, caffeine is a natural pesticide. It is quite likely that plants contain caffeine because it affects the nervous system of most would-be consumers, discouraging them from eating it. Of course, that is precisely the attraction for the human animal. (Pg. 375)