Feels unfair to rate a book I didn't finish.
This was the wrong book for me. I'd visited a roman ruin and picked up a book in the bookshop simply wanting to know a little bit more about the roman world in Britain.
This book though is for the scholars of this world, and perhaps archaeologists in particular, rather than the general reader with a casual interest like myself. I was looking for a fairly fluid narrative about life in Britain for the soldiers, the Britons themselves, etc. but instead it focuses on the minutiae of extant ruins, and is militantly cautious about any speculation as to various purposes, which is creditable from the historical record point of view, but infuriating from the readers'. That level of caution for the reader could be dealt with in the pre-amble, the introduction, rather than in every chapter. I'm not an idiot, I appreciate there will be limits to what can be known or extrapolated upon based on limited ruins, or more limited records or books, but that point does not need to be re-iterated every 10 pages or so.
But these are probably unfair laments, I am not the target reader of this book. It is nevertheless well written, and whilst I got bogged down in endless detail about forts ( I gave up around the chapter on the Antonine Wall ) that didn't interest me much, I can imagine it being a highly valuable resource for those much more invested in the subject matter.
Perhaps if I choose to allot myself to one chapter a month, that takes the pressure off.