Sherlock Holmes is a classic. These tales were revolutionary in their time and I can still appreciate Doyle's first use of what would later become tropes. The problem, as always, is one of time. So many people have been able to use, play, perfect and even parody these tropes, that seeing the original again can make it lose a little luster. It turns out that when I read this as a child, I loved the cleverness of the deductions (the curious incidence of the dog in the nighttime, for example). But as an adult rereading these tales, I realized that Doyle doesn't always play fair. Sometimes, Sherlock just cooks up solutions at the end without giving the reader the same clues. Sometimes those deductions are based on sloppy biases. Sometimes, there's a whole lot of telling and not a lot of showing (especially action!). But the seed is there, and it's worth it to find that seed all over again.