Hold anyone accountable. Master performance discussions. Get RESULTS. Broken promises, missed deadlines, poor behavior--they don't just make others' lives miserable; they can sap up to 50 percent of organizational performance and account for the vast majority of divorces. Crucial Accountability offers the tools for improving relationships in the workplace and in life and for resolving all these problems--permanently.
PRAISE FOR "CRUCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY"
""Revolutionary ideas ... opportunities for breakthrough ..."" -- Stephen R. Covey, author of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People
""Unleash the true potential of a relationship or organization and move it to the next level."" -- Ken Blanchard, coauthor of The One Minute Manager
""The most recommended and most effective resource in my library."" -- Stacey Allerton Firth, Vice President, Human Resources, Ford of Canada
""Brilliant strategies for those difficult discussions at home and in the workplace."" -- Soledad O'Brien, CNN news anchor and producer
""This book is the real deal.... Read it, underline it, learn from it. It's a gem."" -- Mike Murray, VP Human Resources and Administration (retired), Microsoft
How I came to reading this book was by attending a book discussion group this past fall that unanimously decided to read the first installment in the Crucial Skills series, Crucial Conversations. The group’s format is every member reads one chapter each week and then comes to the meeting to discuss the assigned reading, leaving the floor open for anyone to speak about something that stood out to them, or how that chapter pertained to anything they were experiencing. This structure really helped maximize what I got from this vademecum because the group meetings also allowed us to practice the methods taught in each chapter and prove their applicability. I took some useful communication techniques with me from this reading and discussion endeavor and gave it a solid 4-star Goodreads rating.
Then, after we concluded the final chapter of Crucial Conversations, the discussion turned to what book did the group want to read next. The loudest suggestion was to read the next installment in the Crucial Skills series, Crucial Accountability.
Initially, my thought going in was this book is just an opportunity to capitalize on something genuinely good that would only rehash the same old material for the sake of selling however millions of more copies. Feeling a sense of obligation to the group I decided to continue participating, even though I suspected this book was not going to offer anything new. I went in a little salty with the intention of finding any faults, my critical eye searching to find something wrong in each chapter, and as suspected, it did reuse the same concepts. Howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrr… The presentation of these same strategies being executed specifically in conversations about accountability exhibited another layer of their usefulness.
Who’d a thunk by telling people exactly what you want could instantly solve long-standing disappointments? Sounds obvious when stated this succinctly, but this is another one of those simple solutions that I myself have repeatedly overlooked. Expressing what we would like or not like to happen is not the same as being a demanding tyrant. Being clear about your expectations and then intentionally following up with a conversation about what went well and what fell short of those objectives is an effective way to have our needs met.
“Excuse me mate, there is something I would really like to discuss with you, so when is a good time for you to be available to do that?”
“What!? Who are you and wh-wha-what are you doing in my house? What the, no, just get, just GET OUT!!!”
“Obviously now is not the best time for you. When do you think you might want to meet and talk?”
“HONEY!!! There’s some crazy muthafucka in our house, I think he’s high, call the cops NOW!”
“Yeah, but…”
Yet, not every conversation will go as perfectly as planned, but you also won’t get any results unless you at least try to engage. This duology from the Crucial Skills series equips the reader with the tools to navigate through uncomfortable conversations in a constructive and positive way. I will not rate this as high as Crucial Conversations because it did not have the same eye-opening ah-ha effect, but it was worth my time to read because it increased my confidence to engage in conversations about accountability. What Crucial Conversations gave me and the people in the book discussion group (all of whom I also live with) was a shared language that we are using to help work through our problems and the frustrations that come with living in a congested community. Crucial Accountability has now given us additional tools to support us in holding each other accountable.
The business communication ideas in this book are sound. However, there are two example stories in this book that should banish it back to the 1950s. In one, the author uses the term “hussy” to describe a woman - clearly unacceptable in 2019, particularly in a business setting. In the other example, a husband tries to coerce his wife into an intimate encounter when she clearly says no. This is not a communication issue for the business environment. It perpetuates patriarchal stereotypes - clearly unacceptable for the business world. Perhaps the author could take a moment to review the audience for the book. These outdated ideas about women have no place in the current business climate. I gave it two stars for the excellent ideas it offers, but they are lost in the misogyny.
“If something comes up, let me know right away.” Then decide together.
THE BIG IDEAS FROM EACH STEP:
Choose What and If
• What - Ask yourself what you really want. You can talk about the content, the pattern, or the relationship. To stay focused, ask what you really want.
• If - Are you talking yourself out of an accountability discussion? Don’t let fear substitute for reason. Think carefully not just about the risks of having the conversation but also about the risks of not having it.
Master my stories
Instead of assuming the worst and then acting in ways that confirm your story, stop and tell the rest of the story. Ask: “why would a reasonable person not do what he or she promised?“ “What role might I have played?“ When you see the other person as a human being rather than a villain, you’re ready to begin.
Describe the gap
Make it safe by starting with the facts and describing the gap between what was expected and what was observed. Tentatively share your story or only after you’ve shared your fax. And with a question to help diagnose.
Make it motivating and easy
After you’ve paused to diagnose, listen for motivation and ability. Remember you rarely need power. In fact, power puts you at risk. Instead, make it motivating and make it easy. To do that, explore the six sources of influence. Remember to consider the social and structural sources of influence.
Agree on a plan and follow up.
Remember who does what by win and then follow what this idea is simple and services it’s own reminder. Then asked to make sure you’re not leaving out any details or missing any possible barriers.
Stay focused and flexible
As other issues come up, don’t meander; consciously choose whether to change the conversation to the new issue. Waive the new infraction. If it’s more serious or time sensitive, deal with it. If it is not, don’t get sidetracked.
Subtitled “Tools for Resolving Violated Expectations, Broken Commitments, and Bad Behavior,” this book is the updated version of “Crucial Conversations.” The authors are the leaders of Vitalsmarts, an innovator in best-practices training products and services.
After describing exactly what “crucial accountability” is, the authors start in Part One by having the reader look in the mirror, determining what should be addressed personally before any discussion takes place. Choosing “what” and “if” focuses on what conversation should take place, if any. They encourage you to “master your story,” being sure that your mind is in the right place before you say a word. In other words don’t assume you know what caused anyone to act the way they did! You’re probably wrong!
Part Two focuses on “creating safety,” providing practical advice on how to start an accountability discussion, creating motivation for change, encouraging commitment and staying focused while being flexible in the face of the inevitable “curve balls” that often occur.
Part Three, “Move to Action,” speaks to agreeing to a specific plan, following up, dealing with complicated problems, as well as a great chapter on what they call the “Yeah-Buts” (”I already tried that, and it didn’t work!”).
This extremely practical book closes with a self-assessment for the readers to measure their skills in holding an accountability discussion, as well as presenting diagnostic questions for the author’s “Six Source Model” to assist in understanding why people do what they do (back to Master the Story). The six sources they suggest are 1) Self, Motivate (Pain and Pleasure), 2) Self, Enable (Strengths and Weaknesses), 3)Others, Motivate (Praise and Pressure), 4)Others, Enable (Helps and Hindrances). 5)Things, Motivate (Carrots and Sticks) and 6)Things, Enable (Bridges and Barriers).
The appendix closes with advice on actions to take “When Things Go Right” as well as providing a collection of discussion questions for reading groups.
An exceptional resource for anyone who needs to “have that talk,” whether at home or in the workplace!
It’s a fact of life that we all have to work with someone at some point and it’s not always the easiest thing to do. From working within your family unit, to cooperative efforts in school, or the individuals who make up the work place, each individual has his own idea how certain things should work. Naturally, when multiple ideas and personalities come into play, things may not be done in the most efficient manner and cause problems that need to be discussed. The issue, most individuals would rather avoid such conversations, but accountability is an important aspect of life. The authors in this book discuss the fact that accountability, and the hesitation or reluctance to confront another individual about his accountability, is a very human thing. In that way, the authors describe a process that makes all parties involved feel human. Each party feels heard and understood, and ideally, if both sides stick to their shard agreements, trust and respect are restored, both parties take accountability in their actions, and the situations in day to day life can become a more positive experience.
The principles in this book are dynamite, but they are mostly a rehashing and reapplication from the original "Crucial Conversations," which I highly recommend. I would give this more stars if I hadn't read CC. Still, some of the newer material in this book might make its way into my Organizational Behavior course.
This book as well as Crucial Conversations are two of my favorite business books. If tough conversations are a challenge, either at work or in your personal life, these are a great resource.
I really liked this book. I got it for work - hoping to improve difficult conversations. I picked up a lot - there's a lot of highlighting and thoughts. I would have to stop and ponder while reading it. However, it's a bit of a slow starter. The first three chapters kept talking about the importance of having these conversations. And I knew that. That's why I got the book.
The book was good. It gave great examples and helped me. It can be used for many different situations. I will have to reread it and keep working on those conversations.
This book is another Vital Smarts installment that focuses on applying behavioral science to interpersonal relationships. The book uses the same framework as other books by the same authors (Crucial Conversations, The Influencer) that they refer to as the Six Sources of Influence.
Crucial Accountability provides a practical guide to holding others accountable. Unlike many self-help books, it is packed full of valuable insights. I found myself preferring to take it in small bites to give myself time to ruminate on the content.
Okay confession I almost finished the book but probs won’t. This book is useful if you’re in a highly competitive secular work environment where people’s virtue is questionable. In missionary work a little less applicable on the super extreme examples they give with disrespect. I also thought some of the examples were ridiculous so I didn’t love that. Did learn some good techniques on how to have accountability convos. I have to say business books not my top choice for reading.
I didn't know how much I needed this book until I read it for one of my classes. As someone who has had hard time confronting people all her life, this was a precious little tool to learn those little techniques that could be used to have a proper 'accountability conversation' with someone you need to confront.
Not a lot of new material in this book, but it does an excellent job of reinforcing the principles and practices from Crucial Conversations and Crucial Confrontations. A very good refresher, and well worth the read...
Tangible tips that every leader should know. I look forward to using this every single day in my job. The answers to dealing with difficult bosses, employees who fall short on promises... it’s all here
Where has this book been all my life? It is hands-down the best manual on giving feedback that I've ever seen. Practical and not preachy, and you can start applying the lessons you learn immediately, both in professional and personal settings.
The techniques and structures used remind me a lot of non violent communication; a big difference with NVC is that is going into a very specific focus on accountability. A great read, more of a manual, for anyone especially in a leadership role.
Rounding this one up to 4 stars out of respect for Crucial Conversations, which I loved. This one was more of the same, but also not as strong. The ratio of actionable advice to filler didn’t quite meet the bar for me.
I hate these types of books but this one was actually okay. Probably a really great read for people pleasers; I am not one, but enjoyed the framework this provided. Some of the examples are so outdated and inappropriate for a book aimed at professionals.
This book is exceptionally good. I listened to it on Audible, but it didn't work too well. It needs to be read, practiced and embodied. I highly recommend it.
This book was good in that it explained context and gave examples for different type of scenarios. I feel a bit overwhelmed after and wish there were some sort of formula or take away notes that I could obtain to have something concrete to implement in my job as a Managing Attorney. I listened to the audiobook and they reference some sort of download on the website. I had to input my information and I hope it does get sent. I think there are a lot of great takeaways and with having a visual aide it will help me sort though it all to more concretely take action on items discussed here.
This book seemed to have a much clearer structure than Crucial Conversations, which makes it easier to remember and apply the concepts. There is a lot of basic advice in here, but conversations are complicated and it helps to know why the basic advice works and why allowing ourselves to ignore it makes things worse.
Oh look, I'm finally reviewing this, almost two months later. This is what comes of getting behind :-D
As is usual for books by this crew, the content is top notch and provides valuable tools. As is also the case for books by this group, as writing, it's a bit dry.
This book covers crucial accountability conversations. These conversations are reserved for serious violated expectations or broken commitments. Often they are challenging to even start. The first part of the model asks you to consider: is this a time for an accountability conversation? Figure out what the conversation should be about and then if it is worth having. Not all problems are serious enough to warrant an accountability conversation. One useful tool from this section is to think about repeated infractions through the lens of CPR. The first time a violation occurs, discuss the content ("you were late for an important meeting"). The second time, discuss the pattern ("you are regularly late for an important meeting"). The third time, start to discuss the impact on your relationship ("I can no longer trust you to handle important meetings").
The second part of the model asks you to make sure that you are not looking at the event too narrowly. Come in informed. Ask yourself why a reasonable, rational person would do what you've observed (keep asking until you actually believe your answer). While doing this, look at all of the sources of influence on a person (this pulls heavily from the model in Influencer): what are their sources of personal motivation? Peer motivation? Structural motivation (e.g., incentives and punishments)? What about their personal ability? Do they have the right support from others? Does the structure and environment support their getting the task done?
Finally, you are ready to have the accountability conversation. The most important thing is to create an atmosphere of psychological safety. If a topic is not particularly sensitive then you can start by simply and directly describe the performance gap between what was expected and what was observed. Do not include your interpretation yet. If you see signs that safety is at risk, stop immediately and work to repair it. Then tentatively share your interpretation about what happened. Finally, end with a simple, sincere, "What happened?"
If safety is at risk, consider why. The two primary reasons people feel unsafe is that they believe that you do not respect them as a person or they believe that your goals are at odds with theirs. To restore safety, first make sure you really do respect the other person. You can't fake it. Then you can use contrasting to explicitly say what you don't mean, "I am not saying you do not care about these important meetings. It's just that regularly being late...". If the problem is lack of mutual purpose, again start by looking at yourself. Is your goal aligned with their goals? If not, then the conversation is not likely to go well. If it is aligned, then openly stating your goal can help get the conversation back on track ("I really want you to be at your most effective when interacting with our VP."). Other things that help are always (always always) having accountability conversations in private and asking permission before discussing delicate topics.
Once mutual purpose has been established and you both agree on the accountability gap, the next step is to motivate the other person to overcome the gap. Look at the influence model to figure out what motivations may be lacking. Do not be afraid to highlight the natural consequences of failing to change. On the flip side, don't assume that everything is a motivation problem. Look for gaps in ability. And be honest about the impact of social and structural challenges on motivation and ability. If there is social status loss associated with closing the gap or if there are structural reasons that make execution hard, then focusing on personal motivation and skills will not be enough. Or to put it another way, fixing the accountability gap may not be something that the other person can do on their own.
Importantly, make sure the end of the conversation clearly defines who will do what by when. Make sure that the details are clear. Vague commitments to do better next time are not sufficient. Ask whatever clarifying questions you need to be confident that the plan addresses the issue. And then, critically, remember to actually follow-up. Consider this your responsibility as the person who initiated the conversation.
That's the gist of the model. The book itself contains numerous illustrative examples as well as discussions of what not to do.
Ending on a personal note, doing this is hard. A real accountability conversation takes time and work, and it's easy to try and skimp on the preparation. However, without this, as I know from personal experience, it's altogether too easy to get stuck in the debating the details of the content rather than the accountability gap. And it's even easier to not have time to get a clear and agreed upon commitment on next steps. Having a model helps you see what you're doing wrong, but only practice will get you to the point where you do it right.
Overall, it was very informative, however, there was a lot of information that I was already well aware of. I mean, it’s to be expected that they are going to cover the basics of interactions but it nearly put me in a reading slump trying to get through some of those chapters. When I feel like I’m not getting anything out of it, it becomes difficult to carry on.
Here are thoughts that I felt impactful enough to mark:
“Rare is the sudden and unexpected emotional explosion that wasn’t preceded by a lengthy period of tortured silence.”
“Ask yourself, ‘Why would a reasonable, rational, and decent person do that?’”
“Social pressure is the mother of all stupidity.”
“We become righteously indignant only when others have tread on sacred ground.”