100 Years of Weird is "The Official Anthology Celebrating the First Century of the Unique Magazine" (according to the back of the jacket). In smaller text beneath it, it says 'Classic and New Tales'.
When my wife bought me this book for my birthday, I think she was hedging more upon the 'classic' than the 'new', hoping to fulfill my desire to read some old issues of Weird Tales Magazine. The end result of this book is an INTERESTING (dare I say 'weird') hodgepodge of new stories, classic stories, poems, and editorials pieces and essays all thrown together with something of the feel of a project that someone on a budget said "Hey, let's get together a 100 years anniversary book! Anyone else interested? ...C'mon guys, it's 100 years! C'moooon." ...and then it came together with moderate success.
What I didn't like:
I guess it's mandatory that you HAVE to include 'the Call of Cthulhu' in any anthology collection that even touches Lovecraft. Fair enough, in a way, that being the most famous piece of weird fiction ever created. But this would probably bring the number of anthologies I have that feature 'the call of cthulhu' in it up to double digits now, because that's what EVERYONE thinks. "Oh, we're making a horror anthology? Well, we HAVE to have the Call of Cthulhu in it!" I do LIKE the Call of Cthulhu, but c'mon, I would like to read some new stuff.
The same held true for a couple of other big-and-famous tales in here, that I already HAD them in other collections, and not only that but had recently read them. This is, perhaps, my problem, where someone less versed in weird-tales might get a thrill out of reading 'black god's kiss' or 'worms of the earth' for the first time.
Among the 'new' stories (those listed in the appendix as appearing in this book for its first time in print'), there were a few that didn't quite seem worthy of appearing in a '100 year celebration' book standing side-by-side with the best of the best. In particular were the modern attempts to write occult noir in the form of "Dead Jack and the Case of the Bloody Fairy" and "Cupid is a Knavish Lad" ("The World Breaker" was only marginally better, feeling like a plot lifted out of a Harry Dresden novel. ...An EARLY novel, before they got good), the latter being particularly amateurish. The proliferation of these 'occult detective' stories, paired with an overly long, rambling, and unenlightening essay called "Who Ya Gonna Call? The Evolution of Occult Detective Fiction" definitely seemed to give the impression that the editor of this book (or whoever was choosing what went into it) had a bias towards that brand of story greater than a dedication to 'Celebrating 100 years'.
So, in summary, my gripes amount to the wish that this collection would have just contained more classic stories from weird tales that I hadn't heard of.
What I liked:
- The first story, 'The Third Guy", was pretty tantalizing, and I liked the personable voice of the author. It was a good way to open the book, even if it was NEW fiction, first published in this book and not a classic, like I was hoping for.
- "Disappear Donna" by RL Stine was cute and creepy. Of anyone putting new stuff into the book, I give RL Stine a pass, just because I feel like he is so quintessentially 'new weird fiction'.
- "Up From Slavery" is one I had read before in a previous anthology collection, but it was so nice I read it twice. A fun interpretation and twist on some Lovecraftian lore, and it's always fun to see Nyarlathotep (I suppose he wasn't explicitly NAMED in the story, but you know it's him).
- "Legal Rites" was the story of a ghost taking someone to court to demand that they stop trying to inhabit HIS house. If that sounds farcical and humorous that's because it was.
- "The Scythe" by Ray Bradbury, seems to encapsulate the very idea of a 'weird tale'. Ray Bradbury had the unique power to look around, focus his attention on an innocuous THING, and write a story that is, at the very least, weird and thought-provoking.
- I was glad to have been given the note 'Written at 16 years of age' at the beginning of the story "The Vengeance of Nitocris". Though I always believe a story should have merits on its own, a little context can be nice once in a while. Telling the story of a pharaohess' vengeance against a mob of power-hungry priests, it's a story that, were it written in the prime of a legendary writer's career I would have said was a touch simplistic and weak. But for a teenager it felt like a very imaginative and evocative piece.
- "Slaughter House" did what few other ghost stories have done, and actually gave me a few chills. On the whole it's a fairly simple story (I suspect if Lovecraft had edited it he would have insisted upon adding in that the former residents of the house were owners of the necronomicon, and had been magic-users studying with atlanteans and all that kid of jazz), but its simplicity allowed the author to convincingly convey the discomforts and terrors of the narrator in a way that actually reached me.
- "Jagganath" was pretty great. I think if I was reading nothing BUT stories like it (I want to call it 'trans-humanist'? I dunno what that means exactly, but it SOUNDS right) I would have tired of its matter-of-fact way of presenting unfamiliar, alien settings. But as one story in an anthology of more standard fare, I liked it for its imagination and unrelenting strangeness. Also all the flesh and implications of mutation fed the body-horror-fiend in me that usually only Junji Ito and Clive Barker can adequately scratch.
- I liked the FIRST chunk of "The Damp Man". It built suspense pretty fabulously, and I actually got creeped out by the growing dread of two people unable to rid themselves of their horrifying stalker. BUT, I was immediately disappointed with the various revelations of what the 'damp man' was, who he was, and how the tale ended.
- "Lady Cataract Comes to the Mosque". I was confused, I didn't get it, but I kind of liked it from what I sort of guessed was happening.
On the WHOLE I might like to give this book a 2.5 rather than a straight-up 3 stars. Half of it were things I'd already read, things I didn't like, or less-than-eloquent essays that seemed padded to fill space. But I did find a couple good nuggets of new things in here, so... I suppose I'd recommend this to someone who wants to break into Weird Tales, knowing nothing about 'The Lovecraft Circle' or weird fiction, and might like a neat little introduction to it all.