I must begin with full-disclosure: while not a professed Janeite, I have read the entire Jane Austen canon, in order, seen most of the movie adaptations (I even own the Bollywood version of Pride and Prejudice, the awkwardly titled "Bride and Prejudice"), and like many a woman set the bar of marriage as the first boyfriend who can successfully sit through the five hour Colin Firth version of P&P without raising a complaint or a making a snide remark. I remain unmarried... ;)
Perhaps the most compelling part of the book is the many-angled look into the world of the Janeites. I confess that prior to Yaffe's book I did not know there was such a vibrant sub-cultural of JA aficionados. I suppose I shouldn't be too surprised, however. These days there is a "fandom" for just about anything with an international appeal: Star Trek conventions, Harry Potter theme parks, etc. Is it really so surprising that for every Twilight Fanfic that is penned, there is one posted about Elizabeth Bennett and her Mr. Darcy?
But I think what makes the Austen fans unique -- and this is something that Yaffe touches on as well -- is their incredibly modern response to a series of books nearing two hundred years old. Whereas Jane Austen penned her books on sheets of paper her devotees post blogs about Emma and Mr. Knightley from smart phones. To Austen's millions of fans over hundreds of years, Elizabeth and Darcy, Mary Ann and Col Brandon, etc have a staying-power that (God-willing!!) Bella and Edward do not. It's doubtful that two hundred years from now fans of Stephanie Meyer will pay to walk past a hotel she stayed in, whereas today, hundreds of eager Janeites make the pilgrimage to England to trek the path Jane might have walked to church or see the small room she briefly stayed in while traveling to Bath.
Yaffe explains such devotion by citing the universal appeal of Jane Austen, that each reader can identify in Austen's stories something that resonates with herself (or himself! there are male Janeites!) whether it be the romance, the whit, the feminism, the history, etc. JA offers something to everything and in this I cannot more agree more wholeheartedly.
But enough about Austen's books. What about Yaffe's? The author clearly did her research, in large part by fully immersing herself into the Janeite culture. Yaffe does, however, fall prey to one of the greatest threats faced by any anthropologist, ethnographer, or sociologist who tries to understand a culture, a people, or a civilization by living and working amongst them. And the Janeites can certainly be viewed as their own little world with mores (certain interpretations of JA are accepted and others not), language (a whole slew of acronyms to encompass books, plot points, and character couples), and traditions. In her study of this world, Yaffe became too emotionally connected with her subject and sometimes allowed her own opinions to crowd her observations. Granted, Yaffe made it clear from the outset that she entered the world of the Janeites as something of a Janeite herself, though not as ardent as some. Thus, perhaps, it couldn't be helped that Yaffe sometimes let her own ideas of what a true Austen fan should look like, but at times she doesn't even seem sure herself.
For example, in one moment during her Austen tour of England she sits through a lecture by an elderly English women whose only claim to fame is a distant relation to Austen. Yaffe notes with disdain that many of the woman's facts come from the internet and when the octogenarian misidentifies Austen as a Libra Yaffe writes, "I seethe quietly." But not two pages later Yaffe describes the giddy joy of her fellow tourmates (all middle-aged, white women) when they have the chance to dress up in Regency gowns and take pictures in a Regency era English manor house. The reader is left with a sense that Yaffe finds these actions by the women as a tad ridiculous. Yaffe gamely helps the women get dressed but refuses to don a costume herself, saying that while she might be willing to (briefly) wear a Regency ballgown during an upcoming Jane Austen conference (again, strictly for research) she had "no desire to star in Regency Halloween any other day of the year." So the reader is left to wonder, where does Yaffee see herself in the world of Janeite fandom? On the one hand, some Janeites were not "Janeite" enough while it seemed that there were others, in her opinion, who took the fandom too far. Is Yaffe trying to identify the "true Jane Austen fan" and if so, is she doing so by comparing them to herself?
Trying to parse out Yaffe's personal opinions was often distracting, but not so distracting that I didn't enjoy her other observations and the many colorful characters she uncovered. And I'll admit, as soon as I finished reading the book I logged onto the JASNA website to see about their next national meeting. Seems that they will be in D.C. in 2016 to celebrate my personal favorite Austen book: Emma. Interesting...