First of all, I must say right up front that I am a big fan of Stieg Larsson’s Millennium trilogy and consider it some of the best mystery/suspense trilogies that I have ever read. I loved reading those books and was deeply saddened by his unexpected passing and ensuing estate battles between his father/brother and his longtime live-in girlfriend and fiancée. I personally think she got robbed and mistreated in ways that I cannot express without getting downright angry. Mostly, I miss Stieg not getting to continue writing his wonderful series and further developing his unique and riveting characters.
Putting that aside, I had very mixed feelings when it was announced that the father/brother were hiring another writer to continue the series. In my mind no one could come anywhere near capturing the magic that Stieg produced and it was hard not to have a feeling of a money grab. In 2015, a new author, David Lagercrantz, wrote “The Girl in the Spider’s Web” and I read it. In 2017, he followed it up with “The Girl Who Takes an Eye for an Eye”. In 2019, his third and final Millennium novel – “The Girl Who Lived twice” – was published.
Lagercrantz treated his three books – numbers four through six in the series – as a second trilogy in the millennium series, using the final one to wrap up his storylines of exploring Lisbeth’s family history and her personal feud with her evil twin, Camille.
Overall, I was really surprised by Lagercrantz’s marked improvement from his first book through to third. Let’s be honest, taking on Stieg’s Millennium series has a bar so high that it is virtually impossible for anyone to come close to his unique ability to tell an intricate and layered story that draws heavily on our emotions. That is no insult to any writer. It is simply the truth. Still, I believe that Lagercrantz was able to successfully capture a little bit of the Stieg magic and make it work on a smaller level.
After finishing the Lagercrantz’s follow books, I really didn’t want to see the Larsson family find another author to take up the mantle of writing of further stories. I would much have preferred for them to allow Blomkvist and Lisbeth to rest in peace. I didn’t really think there was much left to discover in those characters that had not already been shared and didn’t want to demean the quality of Stieg Larsson’s great legacy.
Now, four years later, a new writer - Karin Smirnoff – is taking the reins of moving Blomkvist and Lisbeth forward in a new adventure. I don’t envy her in this formidable and literally impossible task. I really debated as to whether or not I really wanted to read this book, but in the end, curiosity got the best of me… And I paid the price for it…
*** WARNING – BEFORE YOU READ FURTHER, KNOW THAT ALTHOUGH I WILL AVOID SPOILERS, THERE WILL BE STRONG AND CRITICAL COMMENTS SHARED THAT WILL NOT BE PRETTY ***
“The Girl in the Eagle’s Talons” is a tough and painful read. I wanted to like this book and spend more quality time with our two heroes for the ages - Mikael Blomkvist and Lisbeth Salander. Really, I did. I was hoping for a resurgence and return to glory. But alas, that was not to be.
My following comments are going to come across harsher than intended, but I don’t want to sugarcoat it either. The truth is there are a lot of problems with this book. Let me get started.
Let’s start with the translation and style. I am not sure if it’s the author’s writing style or translation into English, but the style is stilted and confusing, and the flow is so awkward, especially during the first half of the book. As a reader, you are trying to get a feel for a new writer who has a different style from the previous two authors. And what comes across is an imitation of Steig’s writing. A very pale and lifeless imitation that hurts.
The prose also causes severe challenges. Smirnoff’s prose is so jilted and stilted, specially transitioning from one scene to another and back again. Many writers currently use flashbacks to tell their story- one chapter in the current world, followed by a chapter in the past, and then each chapter flips back and forth between the two time periods. Well, Smirnoff moves back and forth in time with her characters from one paragraph to another and then back again. It is choppy and uneven, leaving you in confusion, and having to stop and reread sections to make sure you really understand what is going on. In addition, she uses italic format to share what the character is thinking, so you are spending a lot of time trying to figure out along with the bouncing around in time without warning. It’s a tough reading experience.
Smirnoff also introduces a large cast of characters, which adds to a tough reading experience because there is not much shared about them and you almost need a score card to keep up with them. There is more time spent with them than with Blomkvist and Lisbeth. Lisbeth doesn’t even make an appearance until page 68 of a 351-page book while Blomkvist is basically delegated to a side role, used to introduce and connect the other characters driving the storylines.
The worst part is that Smirnoff just doesn’t know and truly understand the characters of Blomkvist and Lisbeth – how they act and behave, what internally drives them, and where their heat lies. During the first half of the book, Lisbeth is so out of character, saying and doing things that is just not her. She actually behaves in a passive and henpecked manner until the last third of the book. It just felt so off from the rebel and self-driven character that we’ve come to know and admire.
What makes it worse is that Blomkvist doesn’t even have enough screen time to act out of character, because his role turns out to be more minimal than expected. This was a real killer for me. I am sure that Lagercrantz struggle to find and capture their voices, and he finally did at certain moments, but it is so clear in this book that Smirnoff is not even close. I am puzzled as to how the editors and publisher didn’t recognize this and work to improve it before putting it out to the public. Again, it makes me worry this was more about making money rather than creating a worthwhile reading experience.
To be fair, there was something that I liked and compliment Smirnoff for. The overarching plotline and individual storylines had good promise. On paper, they would be described as multi-layered and complex, intertwining family related characters of both Blomkvist and Lisbeth with the mystery/thriller elements in interesting and dynamic ways. Blomkvist is facing the demise of his Millenium magazine in print form and fears the future in Podcast form. Lisbeth is forced to deal with a niece that is way too much like herself in attitude, intelligence, and upbringing. These are interesting and aggressive storytelling strategies that hold a lot of potential. However, As I have already described above, the problem is in the delivery. Poor writing, translation, and a lack of capturing the character’s voices ruin what that potential may have delivered.
I would even add that if you make it through the first half of the book, the second half is easier to swallow. There are even some moments in the last third that actually start to show some potential for what could be, until you realize that this book is a set-up for two more (being a trilogy), and the ending limply fizzles out in a weak and frustrating manner.
Overall, it’s pretty clear how disappointed I was with this book. There’s no need to add any more criticism and just let it go at this point. However, per news announcements, “The Girl in the Eagle’s Talons” is intended to be the first in a new Millenium trilogy by Karin Smirnoff, or what we would call books seven through nine in the series. That was made obvious with the ending, but to be honest, I am not sure that I have the patience and fortitude to read another. Maybe I am just better off wishing Smirnoff the best in her next outing, and I really mean that.
I give this a very lenient 1.5 stars (which Goodreads rounds up unfortunately).