A few years ago Football365 was my go-to website for football, and Nicholson was one of its better writers, wry and amusing. But I hope no-one from the site was tempted to do a Mediawatch style critique of this book, which was mostly contradictory rubbish.
This was a shame as the first 100 pages or so were the amusing stories I'd expected, in which Nicholson described his lifestyle changes from childhood to the present day, and the various health problems he'd experienced. This might sound dry, but he has a good turn of phrase and his tangents were interesting.
And then the last two thirds. Clearly, Nicholson had had poor experiences with the NHS, and a change to his diet seemed to be the decisive factor, which was fine. But in explaining that, there was unjustified ranting, railing against experts, using other experts as authorities to support his point, in a less structured and far less powerful conclusion.
The epitome of this attitude was on a discussion of Gillian McKeith, in which her dietary 'science' was debunked by Ben Goldacre. McKeith bought qualifications and used faulty logic to justify why her dietary advice should be followed in order to make money. But while quoting Goldacre's takedown, Nicholson asks whether McKeith's approach is really that bad if it offers an alternative. To which the answer is unequivocally 'yes', because there is a difference between wilful deceit, and the complexities of the human body that mean that there is not a magic formula to dieting.
I did find myself agreeing with some of his points, but then again, if you hold multiple points of view on a single topic, this is quite likely. The heavy processing of soya against its natural, feelgood branding is iffy, as is the vegetarian morality of farming and killing animals for food, as long as you don't actually eat their meat. But he uses anomalous findings as proof against orthodox views, asks why the NHS tells us we're going to die if we don't eat enough fruit (it doesn't say that), asks why the NHS doesn't give a full list of references for some general health advice on its website, and asks stupid questions like whether a fruit counts towards your 5 a day if you eat it 2 minutes after midnight. Nicholson seemed like a fairly intelligent guy of F365, but I do wonder...
I can't question his personal experience, and if his health has improved then that's a good thing. But what could have been an amusing story of how the virtues of veganism are overrated turned into a flawed assault on doctors and health advice.