What do you think?
Rate this book


597 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1976
“Yes,” he said, nodding his head.
“Please tell me that, at some point, Colin is going to be old enough to be able to voice thoughts. Any thoughts at all. Even one thought would suffice. Just so I know he’s not actually a piece of machinery covered in skin.”
“Yes,” he said, nodding his head.
“And will he also develop a personality?”
“No,” he said, and shrugged.
“Really? No personality at all?”
“No,” he said, and shook his head.
“I would prefer if he did.”
“Yes,” he said, and shrugged.
“Mr. Storey, I sense in you an inclination toward insubordination. But quiet, like.”
“Yes,” he said, and shrugged.
“Very well. Mr. Storey… David. It really would be for the best if your protagonist had no personality at all. I repeat: do not write him a personality.”
“Yes,” he said, and began writing him a personality.
And so it is that, on roughly page 375 of 481, young Colin finally has something resembling a full conversation with another human being. And, by p. 425, he has voiced some thoughts—vague, it is true, and frequently contradictory, but thoughts nonetheless—and, finally, we begin to know him (though whether that constitutes a positive development will depend largely on one’s temperament).
David Storey’s Saville is the next Booker prize-winning novel on my list, a glacially-paced, realist Bildungsroman starring son of a coal miner Colin Saville. A labour of love (taking, apparently, ten years to write), it is impressive in the narrowest, most pedantic of ways. There is a cohort of readers—among them, I’d imagine, Storey himself, if his weirdly-braggy introduction to this edition is anything to go by—who would argue that this novel belongs among the Booker greats. These would be the same cohort of people who would uphold The Clientele’s Suburban Light or one of those Real Estate albums as timeless masterpieces: people who revel in minutiae and respect craftpersonship above all else. These people are impervious to tedium, and would probably call Steely Dan one of the greatest bands in the history of music. They would argue that Sarah Orne Jewett’s The Country of the Pointed Firs is the one true masterpiece of 19th-century American lit.
They would be wrong. Now, don’t get me wrong: I like Steely Dan and Sarah Orne Jewett well enough, and I feel the same about Saville, even though I could only handle reading about 50 pages at a time. It is wonderfully detailed in its depiction of its setting, a tiny coal-mining village called Saxton, and the more-or-less dilapidated cottages in which its inhabitants live. Open it to any page, and you will find something like this:
“A bucket of water stood by the hearth; in the top of it floated a wooden scrubbing-brush. The carpet had been rolled up in front of the fire and the stone floor between there and the door opening to the yard scrubbed clean. There was a smell of soap in the room, overlain by the musty, almost stifling odour which came from the bed. One of the curtains had been drawn across leaving a faint strip of light to fall through the remaining single pane on to the chair where his grandmother in the past had usually sat and on to the sofa with its leaking horsehair at the back of the room where silently, smoking his pipe, his grandfather normally reclined” (234).
See? Pleasant, vivid description which, on its own, is quite lovely, if often depressing. Storey extends this same eye for detail to the minutiae of his characters lives; accordingly, we are treated to such riveting happenings as Colin walking to the Park; Colin taking the bus to school; Colin sitting in a shack with his friends; Colin drinking milk at school; Colin watching people play football; Colin playing football while his father watches; Colin taking his two brothers on a walk; Colin visiting his grandparents; Colin going on a school trip to a small town for reasons unknown, during which he listens to his friend talk and watches a stream; Colin going to a movie; Colin riding a train; Colin catching a ride home from work on his friend’s motorcycle; Colin’s father building an air raid shelter; Colin helping with the dishes; Colin listening to his father talk to the next door neighbours; and so on. You get the picture: though this is a book about class struggle, and the slow, sad decline of a way of life in the wake of WWII and the sweeping changes which it ushered in or hastened, nobody would ever accuse Storey of sensationalism or melodrama. Though he does seem to be a naturalist of sorts, Theodore Dreiser he is not.
Truly, reading this novel requires patience. For its first 75% or so, nothing much happens to Colin or his family. Instead, Storey depicts the slow daily grind of a family living in poverty, and their struggles to educate their eldest son to the point where he might escape his father’s fate (and, one would imagine, pull his father out of it, too). Even as the narrative begins leaping through Colin’s youth in chunks of months, even years, it feels like we’re privy to every dreary minute of his existence. Sometimes, I swear it’s like we’re with him even while he’s sleeping. Things do pick up in the novel’s final act, as his forays into the world of adults involves him in some adult concerns, and he develops into an aimless, confused individual as he comes of age, torn between his allegiance to his family and his impulse to escape the life from which he becomes more alienated every day. In the end, Saville feels like a novel from a different time; though it’s set in the early-to-mid twentieth century, it more often feels like the 19th century, so that, even when Storey introduces more modern elements, such as World War II and automobiles, they feel almost anachronistic, the bulk of Colin’s life taking place in a world marked by a sort of bucolic poverty that denies the advance of time. Impressively detailed and deeply empathetic for the people being left behind by modernization, Saville is also a very conventional novel which, though better than the likes of Heat and Dust lacks the essential punch of In a Free State, G, or the two Farrell entries. I liked it but didn’t love it, and see no scenario in which I would ever read it again rather than, say, picking up Sons and Lovers for the third time.