Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Consumers Guide to a Brave New World

Rate this book
Cloning researchers claim to have cloned an embryo that is mostly human, but also part animal. Biotech companies brag about manufacturing human embryos as "products" for use in medical treatments. Echoing long discredited master-race thinking, James Watson, who won a Nobel Prize for co-discovering the DNA double helix, claims that genetically enhanced people will someday "dominate the world." Events are moving so fast--and biotechnology seems so complicated--that many of us worry that we can't have an informed opinion about these issues that are remaking the human future before our very eyes. But now Wesley J. Smith provides us with a guide to the brave new world that is no longer a figment of our imagination but right around the corner of our lives. Smith starts with the basic questions. What are stem cells? What is the difference between embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells and which is most promising for medical therapy? What does embryonic stem cell research involve and why is it so controversial? What is its relationship to human cloning? But in addition to explaining the science of stem cells, this highly readable and carefully researched book reports on the gargantuan "Big Biotech" industry and its supporters in the universities and in the science and bioethics establishments. Smith shows how this lobby works and how the lure of huge riches, mixed with the ideology of "scientism," threatens to impose a "new eugenics" on society that would dismantle ethical norms and call into question the uniqueness and importance of all human life. "A Consumer's Guide to Brave New World" presents a clear-eyed vision of two potential futures. In one we will use biotechnology as a powerful tool to treat disease and improve the quality of our lives. But in another, darker scenario, we will be steered onto the anti-human path Aldous Huxley and other prophetic writers first warned against fifty years ago when science fiction had not yet become science fact.

219 pages, Hardcover

First published November 8, 2004

1 person is currently reading
40 people want to read

About the author

Wesley J. Smith

31 books20 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
9 (32%)
4 stars
11 (39%)
3 stars
5 (17%)
2 stars
1 (3%)
1 star
2 (7%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Lindu Pindu.
88 reviews83 followers
January 8, 2012
A good primer regarding the ethics of cloning and the use of ESC (embryo stem cells) as opposed to ASCs (adult stem cells), why cloning would be done in the first place, and where we're headed if it becomes legal everywhere ("mixing in a hawk's DNA to improve eyesight" being the least of our worries, egg-harvesting farms in poor countries one of the major concerns).

I appreciated the first 90 pages or so of the book, the writing is very engaging and the science explained clearly and thoughtfully. Afterwards it gets a bit tedious. So. Smith does a good job of exposing how biotech is manipulating terminology to make headway in legalizing cloning. This takes a great deal of thought, as it means defining life itself (in this particular case, where life begins for an embryo), and what can be expected from most biologists, who are just as fanatical as any religious fundamentalist about experimenting on what they see as progress. Smith also looks at the psychology of would-be parents of cloned children, concluding that "it's striking how uniformly their desire to clone is based on a "me" mindset" - no surprises there.

Smith has a conservative bent, and is obviously pro-life. However his arguments about banning the practice of cloning for child production will weigh heavily on anyone's mind.
133 reviews4 followers
May 26, 2021
What a fascinating book - I particularly enjoyed the discussion on scientism and the "new eugenics". Almost 20 years later, these are still major issues with ardent supporters on either side. Even now, after all that had been promised in the early 2000s, biotech has not accomplished what it set out to do, and has in fact created more cause for concern and moral dilemmas (CRISPR, human-monkey hybrid embryos, etc).
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.