Okay. Took some time to gather the thoughts. Still don’t think I’ll be able to explain everything I’m thinking but that’s okay.
For a while, I’ve had kind of a anxious enrollment towards church history. I’ve seen or I guess rather have been interested in that. There was 2000 years essentially a church history that I had not yet even began to try and understand, and it was quite scary, because Catholic and orthodox camps Tend to embrace church history with much more open arms than the protestant tradition I grew up in. Even so it seems that common rhetoric in influential arguments today, frown down upon the protestants as if that if we only understood church history, we would be Catholic. Even so I couldn’t ignore my curiosity on church history any longer. My expectation is I would come out remaining protestant but having a higher reverence for the Catholic and orthodox tradition. This is mostly true, except I would say, surprisingly; I came away gaining a ton of respect for protestant expression, and slightly more for the catholic orthodox tradition. It’s interesting to learn that a lot of Catholic dogmas did not originate as early back as as some of the popular arguments, i see online would lead me to believe. The papacy, as it is today, immaculate conception, veneration, penance, all seem to come much later thanks it was interesting for me to learn that the Catholic Church itself wasn’t in or knives until the spread of Gnosticism.
That leads me to the most interesting part of this book. It is true the history repeats itself I think by learning about so much their church history I can now see some of the consequence is still active today as well as some of the same arguments same problems reoccurring. For instance, one that really has been sitting with me a ton is just sad spread of Gnosticism. In the Internet age much like the early church; and I mean EARLY church, authority was very much decentralized. And with decentralized authority. There’s a correlation with the spread of heresy and/or just bad theology, and I think that’s maybe why and Jenn Z we are seeing a turn towards the Catholic and orthodox Church. Not so much. Or reverence for those churches within themselves. But maybe more so as a response to the bad theology, running rampant on social media in a time where everyone has a platform to speak.
Technically, this book is great. I understand still at church is not a easy subject to grasp, yet even as a layman author did a great job for someone like me to be able to understand, every time he speaks i. insider language he breaks it down for everyone. The book also reads kind of like a drama. I mean these early church fathers are mostly drama mamas/divas ( I say jokingly.)
Some of my fav people/things to learn about
Athanasius
Clement of Alexandria/Prepatory Grace
Ambrose of Milan
Justin Martyr
Pseudo-Dionysus (seems to kind of lay the groundwork for AW Tozer)
Iona/Celtic church as a whole. Cool to see how poetic they were with the faith
Arian Controversy
Gregory the Great
Origen was kind of funny (this guy is now condemned rip)
Early Church Service Structure
Theodora
Christological controversy
I say this all with a grain of salt because this is new to me
But very interesting, easy to read, engaging
10/10 would read again in 5-10 years