As anyone who knows me might guess, I was immediately drawn to Joan Peyser's "The Memory of all that." I finished it last night and, while I don't regret the read, I'm not all that sure I can recommend it either. My hesitation may have more to do with my own feelings about biographies; that's an idea which occurred to me while reading and which I'm only beginning to explore.
Peyser tells us that she wrote the book in order to provide insight into Gershwin's character and temperament. She does a good job of portraying an extremely insecure, sometimes self absorbed composer whose work was often dismissed by "serious" musicians as having no merit whatsoever. We hear at some length about Gershwin's unstable childhood and his complex relationships with his mother and brother, Ira. We learn about George's womanizing and about the man who claims to be his son even though the Gershwin family has gone to great lengths to deny the truth of his assertions. (The author makes a case for the veracity of the claim.) We hear about parties where Gershwin would gravitate to the piano and then play all night long while showing little interest in the other guests in attendance. And, along the way, we hear some fascinating stories about the wonderful music we all know and love.
My problem with this book is that I kept thinking "who cares?" That's a pretty strange reaction coming from someone who is passionate about the history of the Broadway musical. At first, I thought it was because, while I deeply cherish the music, I like to think that I have no interest whatsoever in the personal lives of those who create it. But if that's actually the case, then why was I so fascinated by Michael Feinstein's "Gershwin and Me?; I simply could not put that down and I know that I'll come back to it in the years to come. Maybe the difference is that Feinstein's memoir recounts personal experiences and is therefore much more personal. Peyser's book often reads like a college term paper. She goes to great lengths to credit her sources and it's clear that she has done her homework. Somehow though, the writing just did not captivate me.
In thinking about all this though, I realized that I frequently have this reaction to biographies. The people being portrayed seem so distant that, while I learn a great deal about them, they don't feel real to me. It's Hammerstein without Rodgers, (the lyrics without the music.) And that difference somehow detracts from the experience for me.
So, while I can't really recommend this book, I'm not sure if my lack of enthusiasm is a result of Peyser's work or this reader. I'll need to think a lot more about that. For now, I'll say that if the subject interests you, it might be worth trying this one; I'd love to know what you think if you do.