---Not a mere polemic, instead the rudiment of knowledge--- Nathan Coppedge demonstrates how coherent knowledge is possible through unified, paradoxical, trinitary, and quadratic methods; These are formed on minimal premises such as coherency, oppositeness, and exclusivity. The book also provides auxiliary tools as supplementations for the remonstrative meaning of the book; It introduces concepts such as Exceptionism, Microcosm and Macrocosm, and Philosophical Razors to clarify the exact meaning of the methodology. Essentially and critically, this body of thought is a movement beyond several major prior vanguards in philosophical history and critique, including the precepts of Immanuel Kant, the process philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, and the atomical knowledge forms of Ludwig Wittgenstein. As an essentialist critique of prior traditions, this book adopts one substantial to arrive at new types of procedures; The method has bearing on both general and specific bodies of knowledge, by implication a wide range of areas such as metaphysics, ethics, information science, and epistemology.
Coherent knowledge techniques using a diagrammatic method.
It makes Wittgenstein look nihilistic, and it makes Nietzsche look purposeless. It also provides a standard for re-interpreting how little Alfred Whitehead did with process philosophy.
Not metaphysics, but it does more with metaphysics than most works of philosophy have dreamed of.
Applies to theories of information, absolute knowledge, redefines syllogistic reasoning, and provides some good arguments for the partial failure of some traditional assumptions.
Overall, the best book of philosophy ever written (according to me).
Nietzsche is a better novelist, God is a better coherentist, but darn it this bucks the tradition. For a change someone (has) done something.