Having recently read Patterson's Merry Christmas Alex Cross and being extremely disappointed, I had high hopes that this book would be better, and back to the Patterson I've enjoyed so much in the past. I was bitterly disappointed.
This book was spotty, poorly plotted, jumped all over the place and was a blatant 'buy the next book' vehicle.
As I mentioned in my review of Merry Christmas, Alex Cross, Patterson seems to feel a need, suddenly, to proselytize. In Merry Christmas he refers constantly, and nauseatingly, to his 'Lord and Master' and how grateful he is for His presence in his life. I found that exceptionally annoying. It's not something I'd noticed in previous Alex Cross books, and it was an unwelcome addition. I, Michael Bennett seemed to have much the same agenda. The pious, sanctimonious character of Michael Bennett, who has apparently applied for sainthood in adopting ten children (and what agency is going to allow anyone to adopt TEN children??), feels it necessary to push his family values at the reader. This is compounded by the discussion he has with his grandfather, a priest (????), where they lament the loss of family values. They suggest that all children growing up without a father will, inevitably, become gang members and commit heinous crimes. Apparently, the lack of a father figure in every child's life is the sole reason for crime, the world over. And most especially this is the case when the woman 'chooses a life for her child that does not include a father'.
If this book were well written and flowed properly, I could maybe get past this, but it's not. If I wanted to read a book about the failing standards of family values in the world, I'd buy something right wing and dictatorial. I don't. I bought this book expecting something light and a good read.
Patterson seems to have suddenly become ridiculously prolific, and there are suddenly a whole pile of new books of his - I believe I even have another one to read on my Kobo. But if the quality of the writing, and the need to shove right wing rhetoric down the readers throat, is the new style, then I won't be buying or reading any more of Patterson's work.
And before all the good Christians out there get up in arms about 'when did it become offensive to mention God in a book', let me say that I respect your right to your opinion and your religion. I'm simply asking that you respect my right to have an opinion different to yours, and not try to shove Christianity down my throat under the guise of fiction.