I read the free preview of this book. And let me say that free is good...if you can resist paying to see how it ends. What Patterson, Ledwidge, and publisher are doing by giving away the first 28 chapters for free is akin to what was common practice for Charles Dickens and others in 19th Century Victorian England: serialize the fiction, and through cliffhangers, entice readers to buy the next installment of the magazine, or triple-decker novel.
It may be a smart publishing decision, but does that make it worth reading? The chapters are short, but alas, short chapters are becoming more common these days, as our attention spans seem to be dwindling as more information competes for our time. So how do you keep people reading? Have something exciting happen not just every chapter, but every couple of pages, and end every chapter with a bang. If there's not something exploding, or someone being attacked, or something sexy happening, readers might get bored.
Being written by two authors, it's hard to know who to give the credit, or blame to. The novel also has two voices: the third person narrative that follows the criminal Berger and his horrifying atrocities; and the first-person, colloquial account of the NYPD hero--Bennett. Perhaps having the novel stick to 3rd or 1st person might render it more cohesive. I think Bennett's tough, wise-cop voice would contrast well with the 1st person psycho narrative of Berger. But then again, maybe the authors were going for some extra tension, which is created by the shifts in points of view.
Tick-tock. Yes, there can be no mistaking it. As the title implies, the clock is ticking and there is little time to save the day. And yes, there is a lot of action in the first 28 chapters (would it have been more apropos to give away the first "24" chapters?). And who can really complain about this book, right? I mean after all, it's free! But just because a lot happens, doesn't mean that all readers will be drawn in. Most of the characters are sketched rather lightly, as the focus is on the action. The problem is that if the reader doesn't really care about the characters--feel simpatico, connected, and hooked emotionally--then why get involved?
For instance, Bennett has 10 adopted children, and of course the reader's heart goes out to such a family, but unfortunately, we hardly get to know them all. There seems to be more time spent describing the luxury sports cars that rev through the pages than all of the kids and their struggles. But perhaps fast cars are more exciting? After all, this isn't Dickens and 19th century England.
Another character who might be described better is Mary Catherine--Bennett's early love interest/nanny. Unfortunately, we're left only with a quick portrait. For example: "Mary Catherine was a nice-looking female. I, of course, was a handsome gentleman. We were both hetero. Add vacation and cramped quarters, and trouble was bound to happen...In addition to being the Bennett nanny, Mary Catherine had an art history degree from Trinity College in Dublin and was now in the midst of getting her master's from Columbia. Which made her as smart and sophisticated as she was pretty and kind. She was truly a special person..." (Kindle, Ch 7, p 54).
Well, maybe she is special, but please show us; don't tell us. This lack of character development and general lack of depth in the novel produce a work that so far (through 28 chapters) has no real meaning other than the surface action. Granted, this is not billed as literature, but even the lightest application of Hemingway's iceberg theory might put more weight and gravitas behind this otherwise exciting page-turner.
I do recommend the free preview, as it is enjoyable, much like the action you might find on a fast-paced TV cop show. I would read the rest of the novel myself--for free. But that's the genius of this type of "free" publication. Hook the reader, and they won't be able to resist; they'll want to pay to find out what happens. Well, what do you think? Did you end up buying it or not? :)