I read and enjoyed a couple of Irene Hannon's other works, "Dangerous Illusions," and its sequel, "Hidden Peril." So, when my mom indicated that this was one of the better ones in a box of books from a friend, I thought I'd try it. This was a pleasant read, but I still prefer the other series for its excitement.
In "Tides of Hope," I enjoyed the kids, their discussions, and interactions, and I enjoyed the beach scenery. This would've been a good summertime read.
The plot lagged a little until the drunks came on board Captain Kate's boat, but it was altogether a pleasant read. A meandering romance.
"... his ego balked at admitting his failures as a father. But his pride was expendable, he reminded himself." I loved this! Pride being expendable. A good reminder.
I also liked that Craig met his daughter's fearful question, "Are you going to die?" with reassurance, but without well-meaning lies. He did not promise her that he would never die, but reassured her that he planned to live a long while. He even mentioned "God decides that" but did so in a gentle way. I don't like it when parents give their kids false reassurances.
In several of these "Love Inspired" books, the plot involved one parents bonding over their kids, and/or one parent not knowing how to parent and the other helping. It just felt too familiar, too commonly overdone, although there may be real-life situations it reflected. I suspect, too, that since romance literature is "wish-fulfillment" literature, then some of the readers wish they had more appreciation and respect for their parenting abilities, and that happened vicariously with Craig leaning on Kate for help and his gratitude. Or maybe the wish fulfillment involves single parents wishing for someone to help them parent. Or both. Maybe that's why the plot device is so common.
I think it would've been better if he'd called his daughter to ask her favorite colors and themes for decorating her room than having Kate do it, though. Girls are into a wide variety of things and not all girls like pink. (I only liked pink in cupcakes - well, okay, and in one shirt from an aunt.) Of course, if he'd asked his daughter, there would've been less interaction between the main characters.
Kate had an outfit she thought was too skimpy that Edith thought she should wear, and I couldn't figure out if she did or not. The "skimpy" outfit was described as a green top with white pants, and she wore a green striped shirt with tan pants. I wasn't sure if that was meant to be the same top or not. Did she give in to Edith or not? In a sense, it didn't really matter to the plot, because Craig did notice her.
One other reviewer wished that Kate had told Edith to butt out, and yes, I agreed. I know she was supposed to be a wiser, older maternal figure, but sometimes I just felt like Kate needed to have a heart-to-heart with her and gently tell her that while her intentions were good, they needed more space to make their own decisions. The example of Edith telling Kate what to wear in the paragraph above was part of that.
While I believe that could've been done gently enough to keep from harming their friendship (or Kate's childcare arrangement,) I wonder if that was part of the wish-fulfillment, too, if some women wish they had someone in their lives like that to take interest in the details of life. There is a balance there somewhere.
It really bothered me that Kate stormed into the coast guard commander's office to balk at being caught not up to the safety code. I could understand if she'd politely asked for an extension or a temporary waiver, and explained her case, but the truth was that she'd violated the code, and her rampage indicated a sense of entitlement that people bend the rules to benefit her.
Then somehow, despite her rage, she was portrayed as a gentle mom... Yes, people can be loving in one scenario and spewing outrage in another, but oftentimes if there's a trigger in one setting, there will be other triggers. It probably would've been more realistic if she'd occasionally lost her temper and shouted at her daughter, too. That's not so pretty to read about, though. And not as charming in a romance.
And, yes, everybody does make mistakes, too...
I wouldn't have left my daughter with a stranger, even for a moment, even if I could see her from the store. Especially not near a parking lot where there could've been a quick escape. Plus, he gave Captain Kate the easy-out, saying he understood if she didn't take him up on the offer since they didn't really know each other. His position of authority didn't mean that he was "safe."
As in the rest of these "Love Inspired" books, although these characters attended church, we don't really know what they believed. Kate believed in a "higher power." Neither mentioned Jesus. They both believed in prayer. With a title such as "Tides of Hope," I wished (hoped, ha-ha) that Ms. Hannon would've talked about hope and the true reasons for hope more - hope in Jesus, which has nothing to do with whether or not one is in a relationship. Yes, a relationship can be a source of happiness. But Jesus is the source of hope. It reminds me of the saying: "Happiness is a mood; joy is a fruit."