This is the first book in a trilogy, and it's a realistic depiction of military life in a fantasy world, with just a few hints of magic and evil forces at the end. We follow Paksenarrion (Paks for short) for about three years of her life, from she runs away from home at 18, until she's a veteran soldier in Duke Phelan's mercenary company. This was a long awaited re-read for me, I first read it when I was 14 or 15, and loved it.
The reviews here on GR seems to be quite mixed, and (as usual) I really liked some of the things that put others off this book. I'm going to write a bit about the book's realism, the main character and its language, and try to explain why I liked it.
The strength of this novel lies in its realism.
I didn't find the realistic depictions of a soldiers everyday life boring at all. It's not just page after page of digging latrines and cleaning your sword. Although the repetitive duties of a soldier does reoccur regularly throughout the text, it's usually just a short description, and then the plot moves on. And it's always interspersed with personal relationships and developing friendships. Some other reviewers found this boring, but I had no problem with it at all. It gave a lot of depth to the story, and made it all believable. I would go so far as to say that it was absolutely necessary, that it gave the book its distinct personality. There would certainly be very little immersion without it (the writing itself provides very little).
Paks and the other soldiers gets wet and cold. They get exhausted. They need food and sleep at regular intervals. Just like you and me. If they have to fight on an empty stomach or without much sleep they suffer for it. They make mistakes, and get hurt or die. Wounds get infected. Battles are often muddy and dusty, a confusing mess of arms and legs. Sometimes you don't get along that well with your allies. There is little glory to be found.
Sometimes inexperienced recruits have the wrong attitude or an unrealistic view of their own abilities. Sometimes a battle is badly planned or the enemy does something you didn't expect. Lots of people Paks gets to know and befriend are random casualties in different battles. A character doesn't survive just because they are a good friend of the main character. There is a realistic randomness to who lives and who dies.
So when all the everyday organizational bits of campaigning just works, everyone cooperates like they are supposed to and you actually win, it feels soooo much better than it would if all of these details were not in place.
Paks is a fascinating, but boring, character.
Yes, both at the same time. And you have to have an eye out for details to notice this. Paks has very little internal dialogue. She is a bit simple minded, perhaps. When presented with some knew piece of knowledge she often expresses that she had never thought about this before. A few times she ponders something, but usually not for long. So there's really not that much to her, unless you look a little deeper and think about how her ideals and the world she lives in clashes, and notice little comments from her friends and fellow soldiers.
The most distinct parts of Paks' personality is her morale, her loyalty, and maybe also her feminism. She is very much on the side of the good. She wants to fight for what's good and right, and she would never stay in Phelan's mercenary company if she found their campaigns and contracts immoral or wrong. This results in Paks seeing the world as very black and white. People are either "good" or "bad", in her mind, a view that is challenged by her friends, especially in a conversation in the middle of chapter 12.
I liked how Elizabeth Moon made us see the world through the simple mind of Paks, but at the same time complicate it and pull Paks' world view into question through conversations she has with others. This is nicely done.
I also like that Paks is asexual. And yes, I really think she is. She expresses several times, both in the first and second book, that she has never been interested in sex or romance, and that's just the way she feels. Asexual characters are rare, and I'm all for variation, so I really enjoyed this. At one time Paks wavers, but that's because of the wishes of someone she really cares about, not because she wants it herself. And that's another thing I really like about Paks. She's always true to herself and her own ideals. She doesn't compromise.
Strong and deep friendships are the big thing in this book, not romance.
And as a part of Paks' deep sense of justice, I really enjoyed the short, but excellent feminist speech she gives at the end of chapter 24, when she is talking to a new, male recruit that are not used to the idea of female soldiers. It's all about freedom of choice, and not just doing what's expected of your gender.
There is something special about Paks. Her naivety and simpleness. Her constant blushing. Her goodness and loyalty. Her black and white view of a world that is not at all black and white. Her lack of interest in romance is quite freeing. She has other goals than getting married and settling down. She's living her own life, true to herself. Re-reading this felt like reconnecting with an old friend.
The language, at its best, was so-so.
Using mostly telling and dialogue, the novel was often a bit distant, simply explaining what's going on without much feeling. Sometimes the language is right out clumsy, and some chapters have weirdly abrupt endings.
The dialogues are mostly ok, and is often used to inform the readers about the politics, history, geography and religion of this world. Paks is very ignorant to begin with. Born and raised in a remote village, she doesn't know much about anything except farm work and a bit of hunting when she first sets out, so I guess all the explaining and teaching is fitting and necessary, but there's just too much of it. It becomes to apparent that this also functions as a way for the author to give some basic info about this world to the reader, and unless this kind of thing is done on purpose, in a very clever way, or with some sort of meta twist, I don't like it when the author is too visible in her own text.
The linguistic shortcomings are, in my view, made up for by an interesting world, fascinating insights into a realistic military life, and some really action filled and thrilling sub-plots and events here and there. I would also like to point out that I read this novel in translation, and therefore my critique of the language might not apply to the original, English version.
I have a problem with the way this book is presented to prospective readers, and a quick read through of some of the other reviews here on GR shows I'm not the only one. It's often described as the traditional high epic fantasy story of "a chosen one" on a mission. Well. That's more true of the second and third book in the series, and even then it's very down to earth. In the first book, Paks is just a soldier. A very talented soldier, who gets to see quite a lot of adventure and battles, but still. She doesn't see herself as anyone special. She works herself slowly up from nothing. She isn't just handed a magical sword and told to save the world with it. Everything she accomplishes is hard earned, and therefore feels very rewarding.
I understand that readers going into this looking for the traditional epic fantasy, with great heroes with magical powers fighting pure evil, might be disappointed. If you go into a book with such specific expectations, and it turns out to be something different, it is natural to be disappointed. No matter how good the book might be, you will still be looking for something and not finding it. It is a shame, therefore, that the summary on the back of the book is so misleading.
I must admit that if this book wasn't a re-reading of a favorite from my teenage years, I might judge it more harshly. The quality of the language means a lot more to me now than it did then. I would still like to recommend it to fantasy lovers, and I hope this review can ensure that some readers, at least, pick it up with the right expectations, and avoids the dissonance that wrong expectations can create between reader and text.