I wanted to hate this book, just as much as I wanted to hate the first one. Not only was this a book plotted by James Patterson, but it was also an unnecessary sequel plotted by James Patterson. I lose virtually all credibility I have as a reviewer by enjoying this book, so throughout my reading it, I kept on waiting and waiting for something to hate, some reason to find it bad.
But you know what? This was a damn good book. There, I said it.
Rafe is a fantastically developed character, one that kids will be able to truly relate to, rather than just understand (as is the case with a lot of kids book protagonists). As with the first book, he gets a distinct character arc throughout the book, and it's engaging and interesting throughout. His voice remains believable as well; Tebbetts is an immensely talented author to pull it off, but I believed every word he said.
Adding to the authenticity were the illustrations, done by Laura Park. See, one of my big problems with the 'kid diary' format is that it's difficult - nearly impossible - to accurately capture the illustrations of a talented but untrained artist and integrate them with the text. Park pulls it off without a hitch - the illustrations were funny, quirky, and altogether fitting with what the book was trying to do.
But I think the best thing about the book was Tebbett's success at writing something that's distinctly for kids. Kids books are easy to screw up, because it's difficult to find a balance between being ridiculously prudish and writing something realistic but so complex that kids don't understand it. Tebbett has found the middle ground between the two very well. Not once does this book simplify things for kids - while the plot often (and when I say often, I mean OFTEN) pushes things beyond the realm of believably, but not once does it simplify anything for kids. There are still unfortunate occurrences, still a wide variety of character times, still hard topics (like the loss of a parent) dealt with. Yet I doubt it's anything that'll make kids feel too sad, that will feel too heavy-handed. The balance is perfect, and that's what makes it an effective kids book.
That said, the plot was, as before, scattered and aimless, even more here than in book one. For most of it, I didn't really know what it was supposed to be about, and a lot of scenes and sub-plots felt unnecessary until a couple hundred pages later. This made for some boring scenes, and I didn't always understand why I was reading what I was reading. It's not a long book, and already a quick read, but it would've still benefited from some sizing down.
But it's a minor issue. This book was funny, honest, and effective, shockingly so for something plotted by James Patterson. (If you think he actually wrote a word of it, beyond the prologue, you're only kidding yourself.) I'd recommend it for kids and adults alike, as with all good kid's books.