It is the Jubilee! Queen Victoria's Golden Jubilee, 1887. At Tilbury Docks, Rani and Abdul step ashore after the long voyage from India. One has to battle a society who deems her a second class citizen, the other forges an astonishing entanglement with the ageing Queen who finds herself enchanted by stories of an India she rules but has never seen.
The Empress uncovers remarkable unknown stories of 19th century Britain, the growth of Indian nationalism and the romantic proclivities of one of our most surprising monarchs.
Originally, I read this book for school. It was interesting - it combined a plot of young Rani and her story, alongside the quite well-known story of Abdul and Victoria.
To start with, there are the characters. In my opinion, there were gripping characters… and less intriguing characters. Gupta combined use of real historical characters including Mahatma Gandhi, Abdul Karim, Queen Victoria and Dadabhai Naoroji with original characters including the main story of Hari and Rani. Gupta addresses untold stories about ayahs and lascars, especially through Rani and Hari’s story, with the more royal story and mistreatment of Indians even in a higher class society. With the presence of Lady Sarah, we also see how there was racial injustice between everyone. And racial injustice was only one of the injustices Gupta addresses, amongst sexism, social hierarchy and many more.
*SPOILER ALERT FOR THIS WHOLE NEXT PARAGRAPH*
Linking to this is Gupta’s effective use of plot and the storyline. In my opinion, the love story was a bit overdone and at times, unrealistic. It constantly seemed hard to believe that a 16 year old girl would still love her love interest several years later. Another point that I found unrealistic (linking to this) is the timing. If I remember correctly, the story spanned for about fourteen years in which Rani and Hari both become lovers, become separated, Rani is fired by Susan, Abdul becomes Queen Victoria’s ‘Munshi’, Rani becomes pregnant with Lord Oakham’s baby. Rani yet again gets put onto the streets all alone, with her baby, Asha. Near the end, Rani and Hari reunite. The idea that Rani and Hari still ‘love’ each other is still believable, but when reading this, I constantly felt how unrealistic everything was. Near the end, Abdul still seems to remember Rani - personally, I wouldn’t remember someone I had one conversation with over ten years later (Abdul’s memory must be IMPECCABLE). In one scene, Hari is also shown writing letters, when really, several scenes before, he describes how he is illiterate. There are more times we see things as unrealistic as this.
*SPOILER PARAGRAPH OVER*
Linking to this, there is the plot. The plot combined that of Rani and Hari, and Victoria and Abdul. The story was interesting, but nearer to the end, I felt that Gupta was trying to rush the ending instead of giving it a fully formed ending. Nonetheless, the ending AND the plot was decent. Incorporating the plot with the setting and Gupta’s knowledge of places around London including Tilbury docks, East London, Windsor Palace and Buckingham Palace makes the story more believable.
However, as a whole, I found that what made me give this story 3.5 stars was the themes and issues that Gupta decided to face with her play. Her use of characters, especially Lady Sarah and Lord Oakham, tackles the issues of racism, classism and gender. Throughout the story, Gupta also explores friendship, family and love, amongst various types of injustice and discrimination.
Overall, it combined injustice issues with real life ideas at the time of the late 19th Century, and despite the love story seeming a bit overdone, the issue Gupta was trying to face was intriguing and interesting. I would definitely recommend it to someone delving into a deeper history of injustice.
But at the end of the day, I believe that it’s fair to agree that there’s Abdul with his Aladdin costume trying to keep a ‘welcoming’ Queen happy; innocent Rani giving her heart to a passionate sailor Prince Eric, not acknowledging the power of Ursula, and star crossed lovers reuniting for their happy ever after.
It was a great story, quite short, although it could be unrealistic at times. I loved how so many historical figures were incorporated, and overall it was really interesting.
ok i have a lot to say... time to write with correct capital letters hehe.
I understood a lot of the messages Gupta was trying to portray through this book, and I think she did send some very meaningful ideas about race/class/gender/colonialism in this era. I enjoyed her exploration of relationships between British and Indian characters of different classes, and was interested in her delving into the mistreatment and racism shown to Indians, as well as emphasising the gaps between the social classes and the impacts of said gaps.
I didn't like Rani's character, and, for a main character, I felt she had little character development - I found her being naive and gullible as a teenager acceptable, but even after 10 years in the play I didn't agree with Rani's decision making and didn't like Gupta's choice when it came to the portrayal of Rani's character.
Overall, I didn’t agree with the path on which Gupta took the play – towards the beginning of the play, it was promising to me; the scenes on the boat were an interesting and intelligent start which had a wide variety of options as to how to continue the play. Having a group of Indian people on the boat was not unrealistic, and it allowed for a solid, collective introduction to each of their characters – through not only their own views, but also through how they interacted with the different people on the board. Through these first few scenes, Gupta floats the idea of mistreatment of Indian ayahs and lascars, foreshadowing a similar theme for the rest of the play.
As the play went on, I was able to gain a closer connection and begin to empathise or sympathise with many of the characters. However, as Gupta later gradually changed the themes of the play (less about racism/colonialism, more about romance and characters ‘finding each other’), I began to dislike it more. The ending felt rushed and unrealistic, while also being unsatisfying in terms of the characters’ development and where they were in their lives at the end of the play.
While I can understand that the ending was a metaphor for inspiration for Indian nationalism, it was highly implausible that .
Grand and sweeping, with a lovely way of weaving the threads together. Hints at a lovely complexity beneath the surface, and although some of the characters feel like a cliche, I can't say I've read a play about them before so I'll give it a pass.
I read this for school, and the play itself is well written, but I think that I would enjoy it more if the plot was more intricate. It's also very original and I'm glad that there are more books/plays on the experiences of people of colour in Britain.