This is Mr. Thomas’ first collection of stories using the characters created by Conan Doyle (although I read it last), written in 1997. For this collection he crafted a longish “framing story” allegedly written by Watson as he prepares the tales for publication. This is a common device used by many authors; in some cases a person finds an old manuscript and purports to be its editor. In his later collections, he dispenses with it entirely. I found his version to be refreshingly different.
Each of the cases that are included is a factual, historical crime or event. The author rewrites them with Holmes and Watson as leading figures and some (as he notes) minor changes to provide a better narrative. In general, they read pretty well and seem in keeping with the main line of Doyle’s own stories.
Where they depart is in Holmes giving up retirement (at least part time) and re-engaging the Baker Street rooms, although Thomas never says if Mrs. Hudson travels back and forth with Holmes, also. In the “official canon” she travels down to Sussex to be his housekeeper in retirement. It’s a minor point, but one that would add more verisimilitude to his “universe”.
The style and skill of an author evolves over time, as do readers tastes. This book confirms that Mr. Thomas, as an established author long before taking pen to Sherlock Holmes’ legacy, had a literary style that was pretty well set. Except for some unusual (one might argue, wild) tales in his latest collections, the style is very factual with less emotion than Doyle, but with dollops of “classic” SH dropped into the text in places. It’s an okay technique but it makes the mood swing in-and-out of where I expect a Holmes story to be. I’m just not a gigantic fan of the method.
The other comment I have on these tales has to do with how Holmes and Watson enter and exit from the stage of history. Because the author is trying to hold to the factual record, the stories are stilted in a way that makes his “retiring” from the conclusion of a case (where the real person must take the final bow) less than satisfying. True, Holmes often kept out of the limelight and let Lestrade and others take public credit for a case, but here the writing puts a further buffer between Holmes and the case. Sometimes it is “natural” in other examples less so (the legal excuse for not staying with in the case of the “Missing Rifleman” once of the more egregious.).
All-in-all, I am giving this book the same rating that I have given all of his SH books so far: “3” when it probably should get “3.5”, but not a “4”. I wish that the next collection of stories might be a) all original crimes and b) a better blending of these special characters and the plots. So, far the one collection of what I think were original tales hasn’t met this goal, but “hope springs eternal”!