I’ve been debating whether to dive into Jane Smiley’s Last Hundred Years trilogy. It’s such a big commitment, following a multigenerational family from 1920 to 2019 through three long novels. And I really didn’t love A Thousand Acres, the novel that won her a Pulitzer. (Not because it was poorly conceived or written, by any means, just that the subject matter is pretty dark. It’s a tragedy, after all – her interpretation of King Lear.) But reading Ordinary Love and Good Will has me leaning toward making that leap. Smiley is a master, no doubt about it.
Ordinary Love and Good Will are two novellas, written and set in the mid-80s, though they don’t feel tied to that era. In Ordinary Love we meet Rachel, a 52-year-old mother of five adult children, three of whom happen to be home on the 20th anniversary of the dissolution of their once seemingly perfect, happy family. As they revisit the past, Rachel sees what follows her separation and divorce from the children’s perspective as she never has: “What they say creates a vast and complicated but vividly articulated new object in my mind, the history of my children in my absence, at the mercy of their father.”
Rachel realizes she has given her children “the two cruelest gifts I had to give, which are these, the experience of perfect family happiness, and the certain knowledge that it could not last.”
Good Will is told from the perspective of a father. Bob and his wife are raising their young son on a farm in rural Pennsylvania. They are fully self-sufficient, their lives self-contained – they grow their own food, spin and weave their own wool, make their own furniture. The family lives without a car, telephone or television, with no necessary connection to the outside world except their son’s schooling. Needless to say, things start to go awry and the family’s Eden is upended.
Both novellas end with a chastened narrator realizing the consequences of following their own desires. “The moral of all wish tales,” Bob says, “is that, though wishes express power or desire, their purpose is to reveal ignorance: the more fulfilled wishes, the more realized ignorance.”
One of the things I find most interesting and impressive about Jane Smiley is how she focuses super consciously on the form and function of her writing. (Maybe all writers do, but not so publicly? She consciously set out, for example, to write a novel in every genre, and has written award-winningly in just about every form too – from short stories to novellas to novels to nonfiction to screenplays. And her meticulously constructed new trilogy is a whole other thing.)
With Ordinary Love and Good Will, she told the NY Times, “I did set out to pair the point of view of a father with that of a mother. And I consciously constructed one of these novellas as a more masculine narrative – essentially linear – and the other as more feminine, in which things are hidden and then revealed. 'Ordinary Love' is like looking at a rose, where the form unfolds around the center.”
The novella form allows for a condensed, sharp focus on one theme that comes to a point in the way a short story does, but with more room to dive deep and explore around than a short story allows, while the length makes it easier to sustain our interest than a 400-page novel might. So the form serves her – and us – well. But it’s the power and perception of her writing that makes these two novellas together a work of art. It’s her wisdom and sympathy that make her work so very worthy of our time. I’m leaning toward yes on the trilogy.