Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Functional Differential Geometry

Rate this book
An explanation of the mathematics needed as a foundation for a deep understanding of general relativity or quantum field theory.

Physics is naturally expressed in mathematical language. Students new to the subject must simultaneously learn an idiomatic mathematical language and the content that is expressed in that language. It is as if they were asked to read Les Misérables while struggling with French grammar. This book offers an innovative way to learn the differential geometry needed as a foundation for a deep understanding of general relativity or quantum field theory as taught at the college level.

The approach taken by the authors (and used in their classes at MIT for many years) differs from the conventional one in several ways, including an emphasis on the development of the covariant derivative and an avoidance of the use of traditional index notation for tensors in favor of a semantically richer language of vector fields and differential forms. But the biggest single difference is the authors' integration of computer programming into their explanations. By programming a computer to interpret a formula, the student soon learns whether or not a formula is correct. Students are led to improve their program, and as a result improve their understanding.

248 pages, Hardcover

First published July 5, 2013

4 people are currently reading
121 people want to read

About the author

Gerald Jay Sussman

16 books37 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (25%)
4 stars
6 (37%)
3 stars
4 (25%)
2 stars
1 (6%)
1 star
1 (6%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Mark Moon.
160 reviews130 followers
June 12, 2017
An admirable idea, but the execution isn't great. Trading the index hell of tensor algebra for the parenthesis hell of Scheme is not much of an improvement, imo. A functional language with a better type system like Haskell would have been much more useful, since being explicit about type signatures actually does a lot to demystify differential geometry (which is typically implemented with various traditional abuses of notation, which themselves come in Physicist and Mathematician flavors), but this book doesn't pursue that approach at all.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.