What do you think?
Rate this book
First Migrants: Ancient Migration in Global Perspective
The first publication to outline the complex global story of human migration and dispersal throughout the whole of human prehistory. Utilizing archaeological, linguistic and biological evidence, Peter Bellwood traces the journeys of the earliest hunter-gatherer and agriculturalist migrants as critical elements in the evolution of human lifeways.
332 pages, Paperback
First published August 1, 2013
16 people are currently reading
187 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews
Read
October 22, 2024Peter Bellwood (° 1943) is a renowned Anglo-Australian archaeologist specializing primarily in the earliest history of South East Asia, Polynesia and Australia. He is a great supporter of a multidisciplinary approach, combining classical archeology with linguistic studies and genetic research. These three come together in this book, focusing on the earliest human migration flows.
I didn't know, but apparently there was a small taboo on the subject of migration in the social sciences in the second half of the 20th century. For decades migration was avoided as an explanatory model. And this appears to be partly related to the dramatic events in and around the Second World War in which authoritarian regimes and war acts displaced entire population groups, and nationalism was given a 'folk-specific' interpretation, often also linked to a concept of racial purity. This aroused an aversion to the theme to such an extent that sound science apparently focused on cultural adaptation rather than the displacement of population groups. A typical phenomenon is the tendency in archeology to name successive eras after the tools or materials that were typical of that period, disconnected from population shifts.
Peter Bellwood was one of the first to oppose this model and to zoom in on the phenomenon of migration. He initially relied on linguistic research, in which distribution was a strong indicator of actual migration. In this book, First Migrants, linguistic analysis also receives a fair amount of attention (to the extent that at times the book becomes very difficult to read).
Since the year 2000, genetic research has been added. Bellwood has made a serious effort in this book to incorporate the early results of that research. Unfortunately for him, that early research was mainly based on crude analysis methods, of mitochondrial and Y chromosome DNA, while genome-wide research is now the standard. Moreover, paleo-genetics, the research on DNA from old fossil remains, only really took off after 2015, which has resulted in many new insights. In this book, for example, Bellwood's story about the human colonization of the American continent, and about the introduction of agriculture in northwestern Europe, appears to be in many ways outdated. David Reich’s book Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past, published in 2018, provides a much better picture of migration flows. If genetic research - with all reservations, of course - is good at something, then it is precisely at uncovering actual human migration, certainly for the past 100,000 years.
This does not alter the fact that this book continues to have absolute merit, perhaps mainly methodologically. Because if Bellwood reveals anything, it is that research into the earliest human history is all about combining different disciplines and always being very careful when interpreting research results.
I didn't know, but apparently there was a small taboo on the subject of migration in the social sciences in the second half of the 20th century. For decades migration was avoided as an explanatory model. And this appears to be partly related to the dramatic events in and around the Second World War in which authoritarian regimes and war acts displaced entire population groups, and nationalism was given a 'folk-specific' interpretation, often also linked to a concept of racial purity. This aroused an aversion to the theme to such an extent that sound science apparently focused on cultural adaptation rather than the displacement of population groups. A typical phenomenon is the tendency in archeology to name successive eras after the tools or materials that were typical of that period, disconnected from population shifts.
Peter Bellwood was one of the first to oppose this model and to zoom in on the phenomenon of migration. He initially relied on linguistic research, in which distribution was a strong indicator of actual migration. In this book, First Migrants, linguistic analysis also receives a fair amount of attention (to the extent that at times the book becomes very difficult to read).
Since the year 2000, genetic research has been added. Bellwood has made a serious effort in this book to incorporate the early results of that research. Unfortunately for him, that early research was mainly based on crude analysis methods, of mitochondrial and Y chromosome DNA, while genome-wide research is now the standard. Moreover, paleo-genetics, the research on DNA from old fossil remains, only really took off after 2015, which has resulted in many new insights. In this book, for example, Bellwood's story about the human colonization of the American continent, and about the introduction of agriculture in northwestern Europe, appears to be in many ways outdated. David Reich’s book Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past, published in 2018, provides a much better picture of migration flows. If genetic research - with all reservations, of course - is good at something, then it is precisely at uncovering actual human migration, certainly for the past 100,000 years.
This does not alter the fact that this book continues to have absolute merit, perhaps mainly methodologically. Because if Bellwood reveals anything, it is that research into the earliest human history is all about combining different disciplines and always being very careful when interpreting research results.
January 5, 2021
This is a very rich and highly specialized book that aims to provide insight into the first migratory movements in human history, starting from the earliest human species up to and including the first agricultural peoples. Bellwood uses three methodological instruments to gain insight into these migration patterns: classical archeology, linguistic studies and genetic research. His chapters and paragraphs on the latter two in particular are quite specialized, which at times makes them difficult to read. This book certainly has the merit of being very thoughtfully written, giving timely nuances, as well as having a globalist view of history: the entire planet is involved in Bellwood's story. Unfortunately, due to the rapid developments in genetic research, it has already become obsolete on a few points. See my review in my History account on Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
(rating 2.5 stars)
(rating 2.5 stars)
October 11, 2014
As a relatively comprehensive, accessible and engrossing summary of Bellwood's view of human prehistory across the globe - based on a long and impressive career - this book is very successful. As a convincing case for all his view, and a refutations of others, it is much less so, at least for a layperson.
I picked this book up because firstly, I wanted to read a counter-view to David Anthony's proto-Indo-European thesis (a theory which I pretty much fell in love with, and hence distrust from sheer too-interesting-to-be-trueness); and secondly because I am looking for good detailed info on Lapita's cultures, and this had a relevant chapter. (All my understanding of prehistory comes from casual reading, so this is most definitively a non-expert's view.)
The first thing that struck me about the book was the huge scope. Bellwood essentially discusses, migration by migration, the entire prehistory of how groups of people got where they were when writing began. A mammoth undertaking, Bellwood also manages to pull off the feat of making this break-neck tour interesting and thought provoking - spending enough time on various questions of debate to spark interest, cover some of the implications of different theories, before pronouncing his opinion and moving on. The issue is, really, that he doesn't spend enough time to actually make a convincing case on any given topic. It's not that his work looks shoddy (at least to an outsider), it's just that you really have to take his word for why he was convinced by x or y.
As a contribution in the field, I suspect this is less of a problem, as he references thoroughly, and a student or post-doc could chase the references down to get the detail on the debate. For someone like me, with neither the resources nor the time to do so, it meant making peace with the book for what it was. For example, the whole of Anthony's insanely detailed book was refuted in half a chapter here - not nearly enough space allocated to actually explain the many specific points of difference.
This may, however, be the book's biggest strength. Both Anthony's book and this one served to remind me that a few hours of casual reading is often not enough to engage seriously with extremely complex and often contradictory research involving linguistics, paleoanthropology and genetic research. And it is a pleasure to read the process of scholarship - in which scholars are rarely wholly right or wholly wrong. a reminder of the importance of detailed, painstaking research to grand-theory-making is not entirely a bad thing.
I've already started chasing more information on some of the issues raised, and that's probably the biggest sign that this book was well worth reading.
I picked this book up because firstly, I wanted to read a counter-view to David Anthony's proto-Indo-European thesis (a theory which I pretty much fell in love with, and hence distrust from sheer too-interesting-to-be-trueness); and secondly because I am looking for good detailed info on Lapita's cultures, and this had a relevant chapter. (All my understanding of prehistory comes from casual reading, so this is most definitively a non-expert's view.)
The first thing that struck me about the book was the huge scope. Bellwood essentially discusses, migration by migration, the entire prehistory of how groups of people got where they were when writing began. A mammoth undertaking, Bellwood also manages to pull off the feat of making this break-neck tour interesting and thought provoking - spending enough time on various questions of debate to spark interest, cover some of the implications of different theories, before pronouncing his opinion and moving on. The issue is, really, that he doesn't spend enough time to actually make a convincing case on any given topic. It's not that his work looks shoddy (at least to an outsider), it's just that you really have to take his word for why he was convinced by x or y.
As a contribution in the field, I suspect this is less of a problem, as he references thoroughly, and a student or post-doc could chase the references down to get the detail on the debate. For someone like me, with neither the resources nor the time to do so, it meant making peace with the book for what it was. For example, the whole of Anthony's insanely detailed book was refuted in half a chapter here - not nearly enough space allocated to actually explain the many specific points of difference.
This may, however, be the book's biggest strength. Both Anthony's book and this one served to remind me that a few hours of casual reading is often not enough to engage seriously with extremely complex and often contradictory research involving linguistics, paleoanthropology and genetic research. And it is a pleasure to read the process of scholarship - in which scholars are rarely wholly right or wholly wrong. a reminder of the importance of detailed, painstaking research to grand-theory-making is not entirely a bad thing.
I've already started chasing more information on some of the issues raised, and that's probably the biggest sign that this book was well worth reading.
May 5, 2015
Let me just say, non-fiction is not my genre. So even with the difficulties presented with my poor knowledge of the technical vocabulary and the historical research in the field,I persevered. I am fascinated enough by human prehistory to want to know what is presently known about early Hominin ancestors, Homo sapiens, their movements, dispersals and admixtures. Some tidbits gleaned: Major crops usually have an annual growth habit. Homo sapien population growth to density doesn't occur without an established food production process. The Americas were settled from Siberia via the Bering Strait- and very late -- around 16,000 years ago. The modern genetic record suggests that there were small levels of breeding between extinct Hominin species and our own ancestors. Earliest European Hominins are believed to have evolved into the Neanderthals of the Upper Pleistocene. They perhaps preceded Homo sapiens in their migration from the Fertile Crescent area because of the Neanderthal presence as well as the fact that they had better cold tolerance.
November 13, 2021
Scholarship adds depth to human history
Mr. Bellwood by his gift of bringing scholarship to understanding migration throughout the world provides basis to understand even one’s personal history. For example, my being almost half-European and half-Amerindian, tying the ancient movements of humanity ties the divergence from one peoples to eventual diaspora of two groups from Central Asia which ultimately meet again in the Americas in the 1500s.
Mr. Bellwood by his gift of bringing scholarship to understanding migration throughout the world provides basis to understand even one’s personal history. For example, my being almost half-European and half-Amerindian, tying the ancient movements of humanity ties the divergence from one peoples to eventual diaspora of two groups from Central Asia which ultimately meet again in the Americas in the 1500s.
March 12, 2020
Fascinating book and well written. For a book that I think would stand up to academic scrutiny it's pretty readable - but it is an academic book and has to be tackled as such. I'm not an expert on the subject myself and am assuming I can spot thoughtful, legitimate research - just for context for the review!
February 12, 2019
Although there was a noticeable amount of theorizing which I disagreed with to various extents, everything was well and cohesively presented. The story of piecing together prehistoric human migration patterns will always be an inexact science, but a lot of the ideas here are interesting and the global perspective is welcome.
March 16, 2014
Great descriptions of early human migrations from out of Africa to the peopling of the Americas, and subsequent migrations as civilizations with agriculture. The book also contains numerous great maps!
March 17, 2015
Bit repetitive, but very informative
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews