I had a hard time with this book. I've heard a lot about it and read essays by other Appalachian writers who call it a classic, but to me it seems more valuable as a work of anthropology than one of fiction. Haun definitely gets the dialect right and preserves an astonishing number old superstitions and turns of phrase, but often the stories read more like anecdotes or fables than fully realized stories. Sometimes the stories just kind of end without any real conflict taking place or being resolved, and other times some poetically just comeuppance is meted out to the characters.
The stereotypes are also laid on thick and it's hard to give that a pass, even though Haun grew up in the area she writes about. Almost all the women are docile pushovers for lazy and/or abusive men, and almost all the stories involve at least one, and sometimes all three, of the following: a baby dies; a woman is abused and/or raped by a man who is often one of her own family members; a woman dies.
Some of the stories are quite funny, though, and some are truly heartrending. This is especially true of those narrated in the first person by Mary White Kanipe, the third person narrator of most the other stories. In one story her lazy and abusive husband and step-son sell off all her belongings to "antique hunters" for the newly-created Smoky Mountain National Park, which gives a painful insight into the complicated nature of the park's creation.
Still, I can't quite grasp why this book has been compared to the works of Homer and The Canterbury Tales. I wonder if there's something I'm just not getting, or maybe if I would have benefitted more by reading it as part of an Appalachian literature class. As it is, the book was a long slog that I won't likely revisit any time soon.