In February 2022, Russian missiles rained on Ukrainian cities, and tanks rolled towards Kyiv to end Ukrainian independent statehood. President Zelensky declined a Western evacuation offer and Ukrainians rallied to defend their country. What are the roots of this war, which has upended the international legal order and brought back the spectre of nuclear escalation? How did these supposedly “brotherly peoples” become each other’s worst nightmare? In Russia and Entangled Histories, Diverging States , Maria Popova and Oxana Shevel explain how since 1991 Russia and Ukraine diverged politically, ending up on a collision course. Russia slid back into authoritarianism and imperialism, while Ukraine consolidated a competitive political system and pro-European identity. As Ukraine built a democratic nation-state, Russia refused to accept it and came to see it as an “anti-Russia” project. After political and economic pressure proved ineffective, and even counterproductive, Putin went to war to force Ukraine back into the fold of the “Russian world.” Ukraine resisted, determined to pursue European integration as a sovereign state. These irreconcilable goals, rather than geopolitical wrangling between Russia and the West over NATO expansion, are – the authors argue – essential to understanding Russia’s war on Ukraine.
I had a friend who decided that to avoid media bias, he needed to eschew traditional platforms and get all his news from YouTube. It didn't go well.
When we talked about geopolitics, my friend asked "Why is everyone so hard on Russia?", grumbled about NATO expansion and bitterly complained about US official Victoria Nuland, who he saw as the Antichrist.
This seemed a strangely vehement and specific distaste. He hadn't noticed that his new beliefs were Putin talking points, which he'd picked up from Russian propaganda videos.
I often hear the NATO expansion trope from many people as a justification for Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Those people should read this book. Everyone who wants to understand the Russian invasion should.
US based Ukrainian academic Oxana Shevel and co author Maria Popova explain how Ukraine and Russia have diverged, with Ukraine improving governance, reducing corruption creating independent courts and promoting political competition, while Putin's Russia went the opposite direction, becoming more authoritarian and imperialist.
Persuasive, well argued and highly recommended. The tone of the book is a bit academic, but the information is excellent.
For more background on Russia, see Garry Kasparov's "Winter is Coming" and David Satter's "It was a long time ago and it never happened anyway".
The beginning (entangled histories) is interesting but hard to get through but it pays off in the second part of the book when the discussion turns to diverging states. Really provides some great framing of the current state, problems, and trends leading to what may come next for these two nations and the world at large.
i’m laughing obviously had to add this to my shelf. but in all seriousness, this was a really well written book about the history of ukraine and russia and the politics and culture leading up to russian invasion
This is an excellent book tracing the collision course between Russia and Ukraine following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The authors highlight the critical junctures which, if had produced different outcomes, could have very likely altered the current situation and potentially halted the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine.