Chapter 1 - Antigone and the 19th Century. Hegel, Kierkegaard, Goethe, Hölderlin.
Chapter 2 - Why myths? Why Greece? Are Jung's archetypes an explanation of the imagination's dependence on myth or a symptom of it? A look at the possibility that the historical basis for the myth of Antigone be found in 5th Century BC Greek history. Don Juan as the only modern myth, not Don Quixote, Hamlet (Orestes), or Faust (Prometheus).
Steiner presents a theory that myths are a kind of embodiment of language, grammatical constructs. They are therefore tied on a profound level to the act of communication itself. Steiner doesn't make a lot of this theory, though he returns to it at the very end of the book with the "hunch" that, "we speak organic vestiges of myth when we speak." This idea seems more a kind of myth itself than any seriously meant theory, since Steiner seems particularly concentrated on the Greek myths, excluding other mythological traditions though, presumably, not other languages.
Some of this chapter is devoted to different, mainly 20th century, versions of the Antigone story, in no way meant to be comprehensive. Mostly it is devoted to a discussion of the characters who aren't Antigone: Iseme, Haemon, Sentry, Messenger, the Chorus, and Creon. The little he has to say on Tiresias and Eurydice are in the next chapter.
Chapter 3 presents a generally very good close reading of the key scenes of the play. For me, Steiner credits the play with a bit more than it contains when he gets to the Antigone-Creon confrontation. He sees here a confrontation encompassing and anticipating all future confrontations in drama, which he enumerates as 5 types: male / female, old / young, society / individual, life / death, humans / gods. He does admit at least that the male / female conflict here lacks a sexual element, and refers again to the Don Juan myth post-dating the Greeks. At the very end of the book, Steiner seems dissatisfied with his work: new understandings and interpretations crowd his brain, more Antigones are being imagined, the work is never finished. Is it even properly begun?
I find Steiner a great stimulator of thought, either in agreement or dissent. His thoughts on the place of the Greek myths in the Western mind touch on some of my own reactions to my recent readings of the tragedies. Here are communications from a dawn culture, the first human speech rising from a darkness of silence; the plays speak of a rise from savagery, almost an animal existence, to a state of civilization. It's as if the tales of infanticide, incest, lex talionis, and human sacrifice are told from living memory and the dramas witness the difficult and sometimes unsuccessful effort of humankind to grow beyond them.