Substandard for Burrowes. Seriously, why did her editor not stop her?
The premise is too ridiculous to even contemplate. Who ever would believe such a will? That it had been written at all, for one, and that it might be even remotely legal? If I were confronted with that, I'd be reading it very carefully and immediately consult a separate set of lawyers. Ok, so Felicity is made to be too dumb for that, but Gareth shouldn't be. And that Felicity would actually go along with it? This would be acceptable for erotica (which often has ridiculous plots just to get to the action, and we might forgive it because, well we also want to get to the action), and the book sort of tries to go for that at the start, but it's by far not hot enough for it, and starts petering out (ha) fairly quickly even on that note.
Nothing here makes sense. Brothel owners weren't generally prostitutes themselves (certainly the men were not -- was Callista?). So why should Felicity sacrifice her virginity? Preposterous. Felicity rationalizes embarking on prostitute training because the income from running and selling the brothel supposedly will give her sister Astrid a chance at a good marriage. But the risks are way too high for that -- if Felicity were to be found out (and the rumours are already out there), Astrid would be ruined right along with her.
Of course the prostitute training is just there so Felicity and Gareth are thrown headlong into intimacy, :rolls eyes:. And here's where Felicity doesn't feel like a Regency heroine -- she's way too bold, and takes to sex like a fish to water.
And then everything becomes tortured. Why exactly can't these two be together? I don't get it.
1.5 stars because I actually like Felicity, and when I could turn off the moronic premise and the notion that this was supposed to be a Regency romance I had fun with her snappy conversation -- her stupidities can be laid at the feet of dumb authorial choices; when she operates outside those limits, she's pretty with it. Gareth, on the other hand, meh. I get the tortured part, but he should be more mature than to take it out on Felicity.
I was rather more interested in David who fortunately has his own book. Not so interested in Andrew since he's clearly into Astrid who, I'm sure, I was supposed to love for her indomitable teenage spunkiness, but her indiscretions were outright stupid and dangerous, and I didn't have a good impression, so unless she grows up a lot, and Andrew gets over his survivor guilt (I have the feeling that Burrowes will instead milk that for all it is worth and then some), I'm not exactly looking forward to that book.
Also, family trees are nice, but don't put them at the start if they spoil large aspects of the plot. Or at least warn people. If you want to be surprised, don't look at it!