While it could be easy for me to say that I didn’t like this entry in the series as much as the others because of the time skip and the change in focus, that’s actually the one thing that I didn’t mind in this book. I actually do think it’s a good idea for a series to change things up as it goes, especially when the author explores other characters. The reason why I didn’t like this book as much as I was hoping to is that there were some plot points that didn’t really work for me, and the revelations didn’t quite hold up for me as well as they did in some of the other books.
The six year time gap between the events in this and Brilliant Devices is a risky choice, plot-wise, but I think Adina handles it well here. One of the things that I do like about the time jump is that Claire’s problems haven’t been magically solved off-screen in the intervening years, and she still faces immense societal pressure to get married and give up her career in favor of motherhood and running a household. It’s still not wrapped up by the end of this book either, but I do like that this is addressed instead of being brushed over completely. (Although given Captain Hollys’ insistence that Claire do what’s right and give into society’s demands, I have a feeling that Andrew is due to make another onscreen appearance so that Claire can finally choose who she loves more.) I also liked that we don’t get to see Lizzie or Maggie’s entire six years of growing up and going to school; we really don’t need it for this story, and I think the amount of backstory that we get here covers the reader well enough.
I do really like Lizzie’s plotline. While it may seem out of character for her to suddenly want to go to boarding school and become a proper lady, it does actually make sense from what we see in this and some of the previous books. Lizzie has always been a little envious of Claire and her upbringing, plus given the fact that Lizzie and Maggie have been most likely surrounded by titled classmates throughout their school (and once you factor in the British class system), I can see why Lizzie wants to wipe her growing up in Whitechapel and become proper. At the same time, I also understand why she’ll be defensive of that past when someone (say, Tigg) would confront her on it. I get her frustration with this duality, and it does actually work for me.
Unfortunately, the whole plot with de Maupassant doesn’t completely work for me. Not the fact that Lizzie and Maggie turned out to be titled all along (although I was expecting that to be a complete ruse), but rather why Charles Seacombe nee de Maupassant went so far out of his way to try to kill Lizzie. Lizzie doesn’t start to remember anything about the night her mother died until she meets Seacombe at her graduation, and even then she doesn’t understand why he makes her feel uneasy. And the fact that Seacombe came to her graduation with the express intent of killing her right there, especially since the whole of society had assumed Lizzie and Maggie to have been dead for years. If there was a specific piece of information that Lizzie had that Seacombe needed, I could see that, but the entire plot of the book was “Oh, well, your repressed memories can prove that I am a traitor to the Crown and I killed your mother over it. And even though these memories didn’t surface until I put myself in your life again, I’m going to force them out and kill you because I can.” Seacombe pretty much shoots himself in the foot by inviting Lizzie into his home and revealing her past, because I’m certain that he could have gotten away with his plot. (Lizzie’s upbringing notwithstanding. I don’t think he would have bothered to notice Lady Claire’s other lifestyle—or cared—but in light of the plot of this book, it really doesn’t make sense.)
(Also, I kinda didn’t like that Lizzie and Maggie had already picked out the last name de Maupassant for themselves. I can see it in trying to fit in at school, but really Trevelyan makes much more sense for them. Because when the first reveal comes, the choice of last name feels more “Oh, what a completely random happenstance!”)
It’s not to say that this book was bad, but I think the plot was way too underdeveloped for its intended effect. It does work more as an interesting character study for Lizzie, and if Adina had left out both assassination plots or had focused on something different, I think the book would have succeeded better. The big reason why this series works for me, even if I don’t necessarily like the plot lines, is because of the character development, and I am interested in what happens next with these characters. The plot may not make sense, but Lady Claire and her flock are still interesting me with their various exploits.