I had a difficult time giving this book 4 stars. The first half of the book is basically his interpretation of local folklore. Some of what he wrote was a little um, on the side of what he WISHED had happened than on reality. For example he stated that by the 1600's witchcraft was more accepted, then gave examples. It made me wince as I think if witchcraft had been practiced that openly in the 1600's some people would have been hung. He stated that 'dual religion' was practiced openly... well... that may be a bit exaggerated, maybe a little bit, but I would GUESS what was happening is old family beliefs were just meshed with Christianity but not openly practiced as a defined belief set like he says. I will give him kudos for having the strength to go against the flow and state that swords and knives were not a large part of the practices of East Anglia as most couldn't afford said knives. Since more and more information is becoming widely available, people are starting to think that 400 years ago people had nearly the same access to commercially available items like we do today, when very few people actually had CASH. More wishful thinking than actually was the case.
The second part of the book had more modern day application, but in a beginning and vague sort of way. He even stated that he deliberately left out the darker aspects, and as until the 20th century, most was not considered dark and I did not like feeling that I was not adult enough to read that. If he was afraid that some teenager would get hold of the information and misuse it, I think he has highly inflated opinion on who his readership is, which is why I was sort of bothered by the fact that he wrote a more beginnerish book. If you've never read any folklore, this would be an okay introduction, but if you have, you won't learn much here. Some of it was interesting, but if you don't read it, you're not missing much.