This was another of the books that came from my great-aunt's house. I gave it a second glance because of Mary Higgins Clark's name and actually read it because of Linda Fairstein. Several of the other authors were known to me, and then there was a few that I had never heard of. I didn't reaalize until I read the foreword, that there was a theme to concur in each tale; a mention of thick fog, a word about a thick book and a hint to a thick steak.
"How Far It Would Go" by Lawrence Block.
A short introduction to the collected stories that mainly seemed to be written for the sole purpose of meeting the requirements of thick book/steak/fog. It never really caught my eye and was over before it began. Not the best introduction to an author I have never read. -2 stars
"Foolproof" by Edna Buuchanan
Another writer that was new to me. A clever story, well-written, despite not really having an explanation. However, I am sure that explaining how it could be possible would make for a much larger story. -3 stars
The Man Next Door" by Mary Higgins Clark
I enjoyed this short from Ms. Clark, much as I have done many of her books in the past. It was in-depth, and played out an entire plot, not leaving the reader feeling as if a few pages had been ripped from another book and presented to them as a short. I do not recall a mention of fog, but I might have been too engrossed in the story to realize. -3 stars
"Too Many Cooks" by Carol Higgins Clark
I was not impressed with this installment. It read as filler material. A slapped together tale, written with the purpose of mentioning the 3 thick items. I've never really enjoyed the daughter's books as much as the mother's and this just drove that point home. -2 stars
"Revenge and Rebellion" by Nelson DeMille and Lauren DeMille.
Whereas I had heard of Nelson DeMille, this was my first encounter with either of these writers and I was left feeling relieved when the tale ended. I can understand the direction that the writers wished to take the ending, but the overall plot felt rushed. My least favorite of the set. -1 star
"The Last Peep" by Janet Evanovich
Having read several Evanovich's books and novellas, I was not surprised to see Stephanie Plum as her focal point. It read like any of the other Plum novels that I have read, but I think I enjoyed it a bit more due to the fact that I knew it was a mini version of a book, instead of a full novel. I can only take so much Plum in one sitting, which is why I stopped reading the books after whatever the 3rd one was. This was another entry that I don't recall fog being mentioned.-3 stars
"Going Under" by Linda Fairstein
This is the reason that I cracked the anthology open in the first place. I was hoping for a Cooper 0.5, or 2.5, but was satisfied with a well written, creepy case that took place in Coop's world with the added bonus of Mike Chapman. It made reading this whole set worth it. -4 stars
"Thick-Headed" by Walter Mosley
My first encounter with another author, and another involving a beloved favorite. The basic idea behind the plot wasn't attention grabbing and I felt there was too many players. The story was practically over before I could realize who was who, so I just moved on to the next contribution. -2 stars
"Love's Cottage" by Nancy Pickard.
I'm not sure if I have read a book by Pickard, but I know the name. I really liked this story and wished that it had been longer, much as I had with the Fairstein. This idea for a tale hooked my attention and I would read a full-length novel on the subject. -4 stars
"The Road Trip" by Ann Rule.
Since MS. Rule is known for her true crime novels, this entry kind of gave me the creeps, as I can't help but feel that it might be based on something that she knows really happened. I've never read any of Rule's previous writings, but I liked this short. It was well written, detailed and contained a self-contained story that read as a whole. Granted it could have been expanded, much as most, but it was perfectly fine the way that it was. - 3.5 stars
"Take It Away" by Donald E. Westlake
Quick and short, but not a high note to end the book on. This one read as filler as well, and while slightly entertaining, a weak link in the book. -2.5 stars
All stars added together gives a 2.72 rating, so I rounded up, mainly because of the two that I really enjoyed and the other few that were enjoyable.