Aaaargh! SPOILERS
Pg.5 : "What really concerned Carville was the thought of the world with Germany as it's only preeminent power. ....half mad ... Kaiser." Really, again? How about the scenario that admits Britain had a global sea empire, Russia a vast land Empire, and Germany was a growing central european power looking for some respect from it's literal jealous and covetous cousins? WW1 was started by a Croat trying to strike at the Austro-Hungarian dominance, but no one hates Croatia or Austria forever, like an Anglo can hate Germany. Knock it down in WW1, WW2, and probably hate that Germany is strong now as well, in the very position that it sought in WW1. England threw away it's world dominance trying to keep Germany from competing, boo hoo. As long as we have to have a WW1 story, how about a scenario where England is chastised for it's Hubris and lives with a strong Germany just like it finds itself doing NOW, and what would the world be like without WW1 creating WW2? No one tells that story.
Ok, my rant aside, the author thinks Germany has the insanity to run an ocean supply line to conquer America. Even with Mexico as a base, coming up to conquer from the South has the same problems that the South had during the Civil War. The War industry is way up north. Yeah, that's a big ask too. So, with all this against the author already, lets see what he's got.
Pg.37 : "They are going to war because they are Germans and that's what they do." Just can't let it go, and I was getting into the story too. I will have to accept this, lord knows hate is common enough in every culture clash.
I do like the plan for California, but is that enough to make such a big enemy as the U.S? You will be motivating them for generations to come, to be your personal and particular enemy, where there had been no such history before. This is not the centuries of trading borders experienced in Europe, though they act like it is. The Kaiser would have to be as nuts as they describe him. The premise is difficult, until I hear it from the German foreign minister, so I may still enjoy the particulars.
192 pages into it and I do enjoy the story and characters, such a shame that I always know how it will end. Even given a German victory in WW1 and all their vaunted advantages, still it is all a set up to say we, the Anglophiles, will beat you anyway, we will always beat you. This isn't a world to allow a German victory as anything but temporary. Murica! In my extensive reading of the "Alternate History" genre, it really doesn't exist. It is rather a number of variations on an "Inevitable History" genre. The NAZIs send the Sanger to NY, but Goddard stops it. An American town is transported to 1600's Europe and proceeds to dominate the continent. It's all rational, believable, entertaining and totally inevitable. The winners write the history, and confirm it but writing the alternate history too. I wonder if "alternate histories" are even written by German authors, and if so, how do they end? Have they been shamed into always losing even in their fantasies?
To the artist I say beautiful cover, and as an illustrator myself, I am truly jealous. Though it should be the Fokker D-VII and not the Albatross, the Alb is such a beautiful plane, and that is such a distinctive livery that I always love seeing.
Technologically, we could get more of that into this invasion. The Junkers metal monoplane D.1 can easily come in as a naval fighter. It flew in 1917, and you have already introduced the 1918 Fokker D.VII. Though the British didn't put out a tank till 1916, and the French till 1917, so with a 1914 victory are we saying the Germans would make nothing without seeing an enemy tank first? They clearly continued aircraft design so c'mon and gimme an A7V that came out in 1918? The military may be reluctant as to the need, but designers love to design, manufacturers love to sell to the military, Germans love their machinery, and their "Super" weapons. They would make the first tank and deploy it here, elephant that it was.
Pg. 371 : I'm going along enjoying the back and forth and then again, ugh. "The warplanes of 1920 bore little resemblance to the tiny things of 1914." Oh really, then why are the Germans still flying the Albatross? Even the DVII from earlier has vanished. I am impressed that the Germans crated and shipped so many Gothas, though a Zeppelin could have done more accurate service in aiming a bomb load or in spotting. Funny how for the germans could get no subs to California, convoyed with some Tenders and Escorts. But mostly, really, NO TANKS? They don't even know what tanks are, are you kidding me? Patton gets tanks, sloped armor, and wheel skirts, while Rommel gets killed. Could we try a scenario where the Americans CAN'T read all the German communications, or would that make it too hard? All the American plans work in the nick of time, Like the 7th cavalry coming over the hill, and they do that multiple times, and that just tears it, like I said, it's not Alternate History, it's INEVITABLE HISTORY. Do I even want to finish the book?
I did, and he ticked me off again. If you have not had it up to here with the bias of the genre, as I have, it is quite enjoyable. It also has an excerpt from Conroys "1882", and guess what, Custer survives his last stand, of course, lol.