Culley uses his time working as a bike messenger in Chicago to weave together several narratives: the worklife of a messenger, the dysfunction of an automobile-based urban architecture, the people and ideas behind bicycle activism, his own growing up, and even a bit about Chicago’s architectural history.
The book’s vibrant center is the tale of his adventures working as a bike messenger. In Culley’s impressionistic telling, it’s frantic work from morning to night: dodging cars, attempting to stay fed and hydrated, keeping up with the scat slang of the messenger’s radio, maintaining a mechanically sound bike, enjoying the camaradarie of other messengers, and weaving a way from package pickup to destination. His descriptions of these events show a manic pace in the messenger’s life and work in a city as large a Chicago.
Sometimes it’s almost too much. How could anyone endure working with that sort of pace for any length of time? One suspects there were also times of boredom or work slowdowns, but they don’t show up much here. He spends a little time on the frustrations of cold and wet weather, but I got the impression he was more concerned with romanticizing his work than simply telling it.
Spending a lot of time on a bicycle will almost certainly lead anyone to question America’s complete and total love of the automobile. Culley points out many of the absurdities of automobile culture, including some drivers’ inability to conceive a good reason why a bicycle might want to use the road. Going further, however, he calls for a complete reconception of urban space. In one way, it’s a compelling vision: cleaner, quieter communities connected by human-powered transportation. On the other hand, he ignores those cases when assisted travel is required: commercial trucking, transportation of the infirm or elderly, emergency vehicles and the like. Nor does he offer anything resembling a sustainable future. There’s a good start here, but nothing approaching a well-developed idea.
The narrative of his becoming part of the community of bicycle activists is interesting. He outlines some differences between the “bike commuters” and the messengers. In particular, it’s interesting that he sometimes found the messengers, who have a semi-outlaw reputation, to be more conservative than the commuters.
In all, I’m glad I read his story. It certainly opened my eyes to a subculture of which I was previously unaware. His thoughts on an automobile-free urban core are a good start, though I wish his vision were more complete.