What do you think?
Rate this book
Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism and Critique
Ernesto Laclau has blazed a unique trail in political theory and philosophy since the early 1970s. In so doing, he has articulated a range of philosophical and theoretical currents into a coherent alternative to mainstream models and practices of conducting social and political science. His revitalization of Marxist theories of politics and ideology in the 1970s gave way to the elaboration of a distinctively post-Marxist theory of discursive practice in the 1980s and 1990s, in which he draws together a diverse range of theoretical sources into a coherent approach to social and political analysis. Stretching back to his critiques of Louis Althusser, Nicos Poulantzas, Ralph Miliband and Immanuel Wallerstein, Laclau has also developed this approach in a series of critical engagements with the leading social and political theorists of the time. These include debates and engagements with Giorgio Agamben, Alain Badiou, Judith Butler, Joan Copjec, William Connolly, Simon Critchley, Jacques Derrida, Jacques Ranciere, Richard Rorty, Linda Zerilli, and Slavoj i ek. His most recent book "On Populist Reason" provides an innovative approach to the construction of collective political identities, and further fleshes out his original theory of hegemony.
The book highlights four areas of scholarship:
Post-Marxist Political Theory. Laclau has developed an original conception of post-Marxist political theory that is grounded on a materialist theory of discourse. The latter is constructed from a range of theoretical and philosophical sources, including poststructuralism, psychoanalysis, linguistic theory and post-analytical philosophy. The centerpiece of this approach is the category of hegemony, which develops Antonio Gramsci s seminal contribution to Marxist theory, and is in turn connected to a web of related concepts, including articulation, dislocation, the logics of equivalence and difference, political identification, myth and social imaginary. These ideas have informed a number of empirical and theoretical studies associated with the Essex School of Discourse Theory.
The Question of Populism. A central concern of Laclau s writings has been the problem of populism, both in Latin America where Laclau began his interrogation of the phenomenon (especially the experience of Peronism), and then in his engagement with the "new social movements" and socialist strategy more generally. The concept of populism becomes a general way of exploring the "primacy of politics" in society.
Critical Engagements. Laclau is first and foremost an engaged intellectual who has consistently sought to "theorize" contemporary events and reality, and to debate with the leading intellectual figures of the day, with respect to questions of political principle and strategy. His recent debates with Judith Butler and Slavoj i ek in the book "Contingency, Hegemony, Universality" (London: Verso) exemplify this critical ethos. He continues to elaborate his approach by challenging and articulating related approaches, and by situating his work in connection to the Democratic Left.
The book highlights four areas of scholarship:
Post-Marxist Political Theory. Laclau has developed an original conception of post-Marxist political theory that is grounded on a materialist theory of discourse. The latter is constructed from a range of theoretical and philosophical sources, including poststructuralism, psychoanalysis, linguistic theory and post-analytical philosophy. The centerpiece of this approach is the category of hegemony, which develops Antonio Gramsci s seminal contribution to Marxist theory, and is in turn connected to a web of related concepts, including articulation, dislocation, the logics of equivalence and difference, political identification, myth and social imaginary. These ideas have informed a number of empirical and theoretical studies associated with the Essex School of Discourse Theory.
The Question of Populism. A central concern of Laclau s writings has been the problem of populism, both in Latin America where Laclau began his interrogation of the phenomenon (especially the experience of Peronism), and then in his engagement with the "new social movements" and socialist strategy more generally. The concept of populism becomes a general way of exploring the "primacy of politics" in society.
Critical Engagements. Laclau is first and foremost an engaged intellectual who has consistently sought to "theorize" contemporary events and reality, and to debate with the leading intellectual figures of the day, with respect to questions of political principle and strategy. His recent debates with Judith Butler and Slavoj i ek in the book "Contingency, Hegemony, Universality" (London: Verso) exemplify this critical ethos. He continues to elaborate his approach by challenging and articulating related approaches, and by situating his work in connection to the Democratic Left.
294 pages, Paperback
First published November 12, 2013
1 person is currently reading
44 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
January 13, 2026
This review is provisional and subject to change.
I suppose this is the One-All book on Laclau, although I'm still mulling the rest of his important tomes (Emancipations and On Populist Reason). You get to know all about dislocation, antagonism, the body of demand, hegemony, and of course discourse.
You get to hear some of the most lucid criticism against Zizek from a strictly Lacanian standpoint, and somewhat of a final assessment of Lacanian Politics, if there is such a thing.
This also suffers from lackluster editorial work, although nowhere nearly as bad as Zizek's most recent publications.
Clearly there's a strand from Lacan going towards Communism, that is to say, a new Master discourse, and another preserving the "spirit" of Analytic discourse. Laclau, to the best of my knowledge, transmits the thing one could called Analytic discourse.
I suppose this is the One-All book on Laclau, although I'm still mulling the rest of his important tomes (Emancipations and On Populist Reason). You get to know all about dislocation, antagonism, the body of demand, hegemony, and of course discourse.
You get to hear some of the most lucid criticism against Zizek from a strictly Lacanian standpoint, and somewhat of a final assessment of Lacanian Politics, if there is such a thing.
This also suffers from lackluster editorial work, although nowhere nearly as bad as Zizek's most recent publications.
Clearly there's a strand from Lacan going towards Communism, that is to say, a new Master discourse, and another preserving the "spirit" of Analytic discourse. Laclau, to the best of my knowledge, transmits the thing one could called Analytic discourse.
Displaying 1 of 1 review