Indispensable brief textual concentration of the essence of the hinayana.
'The traditional explanation, [the three-life interpretation of dependent origination], goes like this: Because of fundamental ignorance, one engages in various volitional activities—wholesome and unwholesome bodily, verbal, or purely mental actions—that generate kamma with the potential to produce a new existence. These karmic activities, at death, propel consciousness into a new existence.
The new existence begins when consciousness arrives at a new embodiment, bringing forth a fresh assemblage of bodily and mental phenomena, which are collectively designated name-and-form. As name-and-form matures, the six sense bases take shape and begin to function. When the sense bases encounter their corresponding objects, contact occurs. Contact gives rise to feeling through the six sense bases—pleasant, painful, and neutral feelings, which trigger corresponding responses.
In an untrained person, feeling arouses craving, a desire to obtain pleasant objects and avoid situations that cause pain. When one obtains the objects of desire, one relishes them and holds to them tightly; this is clinging, an intensification of craving, which may also find expression in views that justify one's craving for more pleasure and continued existence.
Through clinging, one engages in a fresh round of volitional activities that create the potential for a new existence—an existence that may occur in any of the three realms recognized by Buddhist cosmology: the desire realm, the realm of subtle form, and the formless realm. That new existence begins with birth, and once birth takes place, there follows old-age-and-death and all the other manifestations of dukkha encountered in the course of existence.' (88-9)
'The twelve-factored formula was never intended to be exclusively linear but to serve as a simplified representation of a complex process that involves overlapping and intersecting lines of conditionality. The extraction of twelve conditions and their configuration in the familiar sequence might be considered an expository device intended to show the causal dynamics underlying the round of rebirths.' (90)
'Dependent origination offers a dynamic perspective on non-self that complements the analytic approach provided by the critical examination of the five aggregates. The formula shows how the process of rebirth and the working of karmic causation occur without an underlying subject, a substantial self, passing through the successive stages of life and migrating from one existence to the next.
In the Buddha's time, philosophers and contemplatives were divided into two opposed camps. One camp, the eternalists, held that at the core of every person there is an immortal self—substantial and autonomous—that persists through the cycle of rebirths and attains liberation, preserving its unchanging essence. The other camp, the annihilationists, denied the existence of a permanent self that survives bodily death. They held that with the breakup of the body, personal existence comes to an absolute end and thus at death the living being is utterly annihilated.
Dependent origination served the Buddha as a "teaching in the middle" that avoids the two extremes. It avoids the extreme that "all exists", a statement of eternalism, by showing how personal continuity is possible without a self that persists through the process. And it avoids the extreme that "all does not exist", the claim of the annihilationists, by showing that so long as the conditions that drive the process of becoming remain intact, the conditions will continue to operate, stitching together one life to the next.' (92)
'Contrary to popular misconception, the Buddha does not explicitly state "there is no self". Rather, he takes a more pragmatic approach, taking up for examination the things assumed to be a self and showing, through reasoned argument, that they fail to measure up to the criteria of true selfhood. Thus anattā functions not as a blanket denial of self but as a negation of the claims made about the things taken to be the self.' (38)
'In his first discourse the Buddha declared, "In brief, the five clinging-aggregates are suffering." This indicates that the range of dukkha is not confined to experiential pain and distress but extends to all aspects of our being...
Each aggregate can be seen as a broad category comprising a multiplicity of factors sharing a particular quality or function. Though experience in its immediacy occurs as a unified whole, in retrospect any experience—any occasion of consciousness—can be reflectively analyzed into these factors.' (33)
[The Five Aggregates:
FORM: material substance
FEELING: affections, sense-faculty side... 'the "affective tone" of an experience.
PERCEPTION: affections, sense-object side... 'the function of singling out and grasping the distinctive qualities of the object, a function that serves as the basis for identification, designation, and subsequent recognition.
VOLITION: action-instigating function
CONSCIOUSNESS: 'accessibility-illumination' of the entire sensory sphere]
'In the mental purview of ordinary people, the aggregates serve as the primary basis for clinging. Clinging occurs in a double role, by way of appropriation and identification, the two complementary sides of distorted cognition rooted in fundamental ignorance. In their totality the five aggregates comprise all the things we most intimately take to be "mine"; hence they are the basis for appropriation. At the same time, they constitute the grounds for identification, for the positing of our sense of personal identity. They are the objects on which we impute the innate sense of "I" and reflectively define as our "self".' (36)
'Since the self is [actually] a cipher, an unfindable blank, this leads to an anxious quest to fill in the blank with a concrete content, a project that culminates in a plethora of contesting views about the nature of self...
The view of a self is what the suttas call sakkāyadiṭṭhi, an expression notoriously hard to translate but which is rendered here with the clunky expression "the view of the personal-assemblage". The "personal-assemblage" (sakkāya) is the assemblage of the five aggregates themselves, Sakkāya-diṭṭhi is the view that arises in relation to this assemblage, asserting the self to be either identical with one or another of the aggregates, or to possess them, or to be contained within them, or to contain them within itself.' (36-7)
'To identify with them as "I" or to appropriate them as "mine" is to expose oneself to suffering when the aggregates change and fail to meet our expectations. To cling to the aggregates is, in effect to cling to dukkha.' (37)
'The Buddha's achievement, on the occasion of his enlightenment, was to penetrate the real nature of the five aggregates—which he called "world-phenomena in the world"—and then throughout his teaching career "to point them out, teach them, make them known, establish them, disclose, analyze, and elucidate them". As the pioneer, the discoverer of the path, he first gains his own release from bondage to the five aggregates, then, on the basis of his own realization, he guides others to liberation. Those who follow his teaching and practice as instructed become "liberated by wisdom", also winning release from the aggregates.' (38)
'The three terms of this argument—impermanence, dukkha, and non-self—become the hallmarks of the Buddha's teaching, known as the "three characteristics". They are the marks of things to be penetrated with insight in order to remove the cognitive delusions of permanence, pleasure, and self. In the standard paradigm, insight progresses from impermanence to dukkha, and from impermanence and dukkha together to non-self, the subtlest and deepest of the three.
While this three-step progression is the usual procedure the Buddha offers for cutting off identification with the aggregates, other texts offer more direct strategies. Some proceed straight from the impermanence of the aggregates to the destruction of the defilements... Other suttas suggest that one can directly contemplate the five aggregates as non-self without proceeding through any of the preliminary steps.' (40)
'So when the aggregates are closely investigated with insight, they turn out to be void, hollow, and insubstantial... No matter which approach is taken, the culmination is always the same. By seeing into the non-self nature of the aggregates, one become disenchanted, losing one's fascination with the aggregates and all the prospects of enjoyment they promise. And then, the texts continue: "Being disenchanted, one becomes dispassionate.. Through dispassion one is liberated. In regard to what is liberated, the knowledge occurs thus: 'Liberated'. One understands: 'Finished is birth, the spiritual life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no further for this state of being.'"' (41)