“Jesus knew all about stigma. He never hesitated to move among the oppressed people of his day, including the most despised social outcasts. He went about his ministry without worrying about the aspersions cast upon his character, his motives, his righteousness.
"If this man were a prophet," said some, "he would have known who and what kind of woman this is who is touching him—that she is a sinner" (Luke 7:39). He ignored the insinuations and seemed unconcerned about reputation. "Look," said those who criticized Jesus and passed judgment on him, "a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!" (Luke 7:34).
Jesus was not afraid of being called names, nor was he afraid to be identified with the most hated, discredited people in the society in which he lived. He cared about them. He felt their pain, knew their hunger and thirst, recognized their humanity, saw the image of God in them. In short, he loved them. And he longed to minister to them—even if others misunderstood and vilified him.”
Is the Homosexual My Neighbor? was originally published in 1974 and revised through 1994. There has been a steady stream of books on this topic since then. Honestly, this one still holds up. The most recent book I’ve read on homosexuality and Christianity was published in 2025, and Is the Homosexual My Neighbor? still stands well alongside it.
Even for readers who ultimately disagree with some of its conclusions, the questions the book raises about neighbor-love are imperative to read.
Many recent affirming Christian works focus heavily on hermeneutics and interpretation, which matters. This book, though, spends time in places I don’t see addressed as often. It takes a broader approach rather than a hyper-focused one, and that breadth works. It still engages interpretation and background in chapter five, but it doesn’t stop there.
I especially appreciated the historical accounts of gay and lesbian individuals who served in the U.S. military. People who would otherwise be celebrated as heroes were denied that recognition once they came out or were outed. That contrast is hard to ignore. The title and premise alone should give pause to anyone who claims to follow Jesus, regardless of where they land on the issue.
Chapter three, "The Homosexual as Samaritan", was particularly poignant. Part of what makes this book uncomfortable, especially for Christians who may not consider themselves affirming, is how directly it confronts caricature and fear. It reads like a snapshot of the 1970s through the 1990s, showing the range of homophobia and how it intersected with Christianity, cultural fear, and deep misunderstanding.
Something I keep thinking on is the book's opening chapter in which it speaks on the command not to bear false witness against our neighbor. Too often, Christian positions seem shaped by reflex, trope, and straw-man thinking rather than lived reality or careful listening.
“In addition to speaking only the truth about our neighbors, we are given the responsibility of aiding our neighbors in their livelihood. This biblical teaching is illustrated by commandments given to ancient Israel to help one’s neighbors if their animals were lost or overburdened (Exod. 23:4-5; Deut. 22:1-2). Since animals were a chief form of livelihood in that society, helping neighbors care for their animals meant assisting them in maintaining their daily sustenance. In the light of this enduring principle, if the homosexual is my neighbor, do I have any business supporting efforts to deprive him or her of the privilege of working for a living?
Zech. 8:17 specifies that none of us should allow ourselves to imagine evil in our hearts against our neighbor. Yet in the absence of accurate information about the homosexual condition, it is almost impossible to avoid distortions of our thinking. It is a universal human trait to fear what we don’t understand. If the homosexual is my neighbor, I must do my best to understand what his or her life is really like, so that I will not be guilty of imagining that he or she intends evil toward me or my loved ones and therefore of harboring ill will in return.”
Agreement or disagreement aside, the ethical questions raised here remain unresolved for the church.