Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Comparative Politics Today: A World View

Rate this book
Comparative Politics Today is the text that helped define the discipline of comparative politics, and it continues to set the standard in examining the purpose of government and comparing the world’s diverse political systems. Written by leading comparativists and area study specialists, this text begins with chapters that clarify key concepts in politics and government and show how theoretical frameworks describe and analyze the differences and the similarities among countries. The twelve country studies that follow focus on countries that are leaders within their regions and the larger world. Each country study includes the most current information and consistently applies the theoretical framework to explore broad issues like why some countries modernize more quickly or why some are more democratic. With numerous photos, figures, and tables to clarify complex political data and structures, Comparative Politics Today helps students learn about other countries, regions, and the world, and it will help them ask–and answer–fundamental questions about politics and government.

800 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 2015

37 people are currently reading
355 people want to read

About the author

Gabriel A. Almond

34 books23 followers
Gabriel Abraham Almond

Almond was born in Rock Island, Illinois, U.S., the son of Russian and Ukrainian immigrants. He attended the University of Chicago, both as an undergraduate and as a graduate student, and worked with Harold Lasswell. Almond completed his Ph.D. degree in 1938, but his doctoral dissertation, Plutocracy and Politics in New York City, was not published until 1998, because it included unflattering references to John D. Rockefeller, a benefactor of the University of Chicago.

Almond taught at Brooklyn College (now the City University of New York) from 1939 to 1942. With U.S. entry into World War II, Almond joined the Office of War Information, analyzing enemy propaganda, and becoming head of its Enemy Information Section. After the war, Almond worked for the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey in post-war Germany.

Almond returned to academic life in 1947 and taught at Yale University (1947–1950) and (1959–1963), Princeton University (1950–1959), and Stanford University (1963–1993). He was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1961.[1] He was chair of the political science department at Stanford from 1964 to 1969 and spent time as a visiting professor at the University of Tokyo, the University of Belo Horizonte, and the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Although Almond retired in 1976 and became an emeritus professor at Stanford, he continued to write and teach until his death.

Almond chaired the Social Science Research Council's Committee on Comparative Politics for many years and was president of the American Political Science Association (APSA) for 1965-66. In 1981, he received APSA's James Madison Award, which is given to a political scientist who has made a "distinguished scholarly contribution" during his or her career. He was also the first recipient of the Karl Deutsch Award of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) in 1997. Almond died in Pacific Grove, California aged 91.

Work

Almond broadened the field of political science in the 1950s by integrating approaches from other social science disciplines, such as sociology, psychology, and anthropology, into his work. He transformed an interest in foreign policy into systematic studies of comparative political development and culture. Almond's research eventually covered many topics, including the politics of developing countries, Communism, and religious fundamentalism.

Almond was a prolific author, publishing 18 books and numerous journal articles, and co-writing many others. His most famous work was The Civic Culture (1963), co-authored with Sidney Verba. It popularized the idea of a political culture - a concept that includes national character and how people choose to govern themselves - as a fundamental aspect of society. Almond and Verba distinguished different political cultures according to their level and type of political participation and the nature of people's attitudes toward politics. The Civic Culture was one of the first large-scale cross-national survey studies undertaken in political science and greatly stimulated comparative studies of democracy.

Almond also contributed to theoretical work on political development. In Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach (1966), Almond and G. Bingham Powell proposed a variety of cultural and functional ways to measure the development of societies. For a period in the 1960s and 1970s, Almond's approaches came to define comparative politics.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
18 (16%)
4 stars
41 (37%)
3 stars
35 (31%)
2 stars
9 (8%)
1 star
7 (6%)
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
Profile Image for S..
9 reviews10 followers
May 22, 2009
Informative, but horribly dry. Additionally, it spends a needless amount of time on a large number of basic concepts and subsequently glosses over some of the more important ones. A middling textbook, I suppose, but the material can be presented much better.
Profile Image for Fredrick Danysh.
6,844 reviews196 followers
November 30, 2014
This is a college text on political systems. It compares various forms of government as well as the processes of each form. It also examines what political systems are used in the different regions of the world.
Profile Image for Marian.
26 reviews18 followers
Read
May 1, 2020
Versiunea aceasta este tradusă destul de prost, cu multe cuvinte legate între ele, greșeli de tipul din cauză/ datorită și cu un sentiment constant de exprimare diferită față de original. La nivel de conținut nu mă pronunț, fiind o primă lectură în direcția aceasta. Cea în engleză este și structurată diferit- cel putin ediția cea nouă.
1 review1 follower
May 5, 2018
Informative, but poorly written and structured. Sad.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.