One thing I like about the Great Courses is that they are challenging. After all, they are supposed to be college-level material. I fear this is changing recently as the company moves toward more "lifestyle" and "infotainment" models; however, this one is of the older style and so still expects the listener to exercise their brains.
I felt this GC title, catalog description, and preview were a little misleading. While there is information on sleep disorders throughout the material (including some very rare and fascinating disorders), only one lecture is about dreams, and even that one spends more time disparaging psychological theories about dreams than covering what is known or being researched about the process. The preview implied there would be a focus on human sleep and managing sleep disorders supported by information on the latest (in 2013) research and by information on neurology. In reality, the focus is on neurochemistry and neurophysiology, particularly that of small mammals used in research. And while I've long been aware of the prolific use of rats and hamsters in labs to conduct experiments that ethics says can't be done with humans, hearing the specifics in such detail in a very short time made even pragmatic me feel squeamish.
The material at the end of the course focuses more on human sleep problems and potential solutions, but it was about the same information as you can find in most magazine articles on the subject: keep a regular schedule, remove distractions and electronics from the bedroom, avoid stimulants or alcohol before bedtime, try meditating or soothing sleep preparation rituals, etc. The only one I don't recall him mentioning that shows up in every sleep hygiene article is the avoidance of "blue light" in the evenings. He sort of touched on this in the information about circadian rhythms, but I think the emphasis on blue light in electronic and LED lights is more recent than this production (2013). I do appreciate that the professor strongly emphasized that pharmaceutical sleeps aids can be helpful, but are most effective for short term use only and that long term use can do more harm than good.
What I didn't appreciate was the professor leading off with making truck drivers that scary, sleep-deprived, foolhardy villains of the road by cherry-picking research. I see his study saying that fatigue was an issue in a high percentage of accidents involving big trucks, but I notice he neither compared that to the number of auto accidents caused by fatigue OR mentioned the huge multi-agency, multi-year studies that showed an overwhelming majority of accidents involving commercial trucks were caused by drivers of passenger vehicles. I'm not saying fatigue is not a factor in some commercial (or private) vehicle accidents, but the way Dr. Heller chose to relay the information strongly implied that sleepy commercial drivers are "the" major problem. That's misleading and unfair.
But I digress....
Then there is the problem of dated material. Eight years have passed since this was written, and that is a long time in science. While it's still an informative course, it's time for an update.