Shekhinah Mountainwater is clearly an intelligent writer. She proposes theories, ideas, and concepts related to a matriarchal and woman-centric spirituality through a well-reasoned, articulate lens. At the same time, she intersperses her clearly female-centric, anti-patriarchy agenda with evidence she has gathered from works of fiction as frequently as from works of evidence. On the one hand, this type of evidence could be said to spring from the sacred well of intuition that has been usurped and sullied by patriarchal forms of scholarship. That is, folklore, which was often a medium for extending scholarship through narrative, has been denigrated to whimsy and fairy stories by the modern-day institutions of academia, while self-perpetuating historical analyses that reference and reflect only other (and perhaps "popular") forms of scholarship are seen as somehow "more real." As an academic, I tend to temper my view of scholarship through the lens of "both/and" in that it would be foolish of me to presume that folk-derived evidence is somehow inaccurate to its roots whereas "science" is the only truth...if that were the case, well... perhaps Pluto is a planet? I mean, I've never been there myself, so...
But I digress. My point here is that Mountainwater is intelligent, but occasionally she moves in rhetorical circles that seem only to push her own agenda. I did love this book. It was exactly what I was looking for, and it has led me to many other books I plan to read and work. Still...it would be nice if someone like Mountainwater (whom, I have discovered, is sadly deceased) could work with someone like Merlin Stone, who presents research with more reliable/conventional supports.
Then again, perhaps I just need to go talk to my minister about all this, anyway. It is, after all, her domain. She'll have all the right questions, and this book has certainly helped me ask many new questions. :)