Please consider this an unofficial spoiler warning. I won't discuss major plot points, but concepts and characters mentioned in the book:
At long last, after finishing the final book of the Collegium Chronicles, I believe I understand what the main issue with the series is. With the Valdemar universe already established and Mags' story taking place near the middle of its history, Lackey still feels the need to try and one-up every other story by including more and more new and inconsistent ideas. This might work if there was a coherent story, but alas, I find myself reaching for a focal point only to come up short in the end. Not only does the reader lose interest, but with so many plot points that are brought up once and then never referred to again in the rest of the series (or any other Lackey book for that matter), it brings about consistency errors. For instance, apparently Companions can heal with the guidance of someone who knows healing? The King's Own has done this before (apparently), yet it is never brought up before or after again. Another example is the Sleepbringers and the country they are from who have been the antagonists of the series (sort of). Not once do I recall seeing or hearing of a country far west in the desert before the last two books. Even the exotic kingdom in the south mentioned in the Gryphon series is referenced again without seeming out of place. Everything with Mags' past is borderline ridiculous and not set up well, not to mention that the talismans are never studied after this. Wouldn't you think something like that, something like what their country's enemy is using, should be studied? What about the Karse priest and familiar from the last book? How has Jakyr been to a vale before and why is there one in the north that has never been looked into before? Why throw in half a dozen different concepts that would have made for a much more interesting story only to discard them once the book is over?
Now that the general issue is out of the way, we can address some of the lesser, yet somehow more annoying character and relationship concepts. Remember how innocent Mags was when he was learning how to be a free human? From Foundation, I sympathized with a character who was essentially behind everyone else because of his past and struggled a bit to interact with others. It was cute. It was a new Lackey character attribute. Well, throw all of that out the window because the new Mags has none of that charm. Whenever he doesn't know something, there is always someone conveniently able to magically dump the knowledge (and skill for some reason) into his head immediately with no repercussion. He is an assassin-level fighter, well-educated trainee who can pull up just about any piece of information out of his brain, and problem-solver based on observation. Mags becomes a character with no weaknesses, which assures the reader that he'll be fine no matter what. Even if it doesn't go as expected, there is nothing compelling me to care about him or any of the other characters because they are all so unrelatable and overly written. Remember Jakyr, the mysterious Herald who refused to make connections because of something in his past? He is now an over-emotional jerk who feels compelled to share his past randomly without prompt. Remember Amily, Mags' love interest whose whole character revolved her ability to blend in with others and cheer from the sidelines because of her sensible nature? She is now a strong, independent woman all healed up faster than humanly possible for how built up her injury and recovery was. Also, she is a master archer and adequate fighter, because how else would Lackey butcher her original thoughtful character into a stereotypical "Valdemar woman?" Remember Lita, the out-spoken leader of the Bards? Her whole purpose in this story is to fight with Jakyr until Lackey forces the cringe-inducing romance (this is not a spoiler. If you didn't see this coming you haven't watched enough Hallmark movies). Remember Bear and Lena, the couple who matured into individuals separate from their daddy issues to be masters of their traits? They apparently aren't useful to the plot anymore and only care about being with each other in private...
Speaking of which, can we talk about this? Why is sex such a pathetically wasted concept in this story? I will admit, Mags and Amily's first time and how Jakyr took on the role as what Lackey describes as an "uncle" (creepy) to explain things to the "oh-so-perfect" Mags reminded me of his earlier character and was a part I enjoyed. However, the lead-up and following mentions surrounding their romantic life were just plain stupid. Why does everyone need to know about their romantic life? Why does no one, not even the COMPANIONS trust them to be responsible or bother educating Mags? Why won't Dallen help and why would Bear ignore his friend to talk about herb birth-control (don't even get me started on how Lackey has to explain how much Bear brought...)? Perhaps this is all Mags thinking that everyone is watching him because they like Amily, but that definitely does not come across clearly. You would think these times are special and wouldn't be done, at least a lot, when the main characters are sent to live in a cave together. Let's just say, when you have your two main couples going off to have implied sex whenever they are not all together in the common room, you've just given up.
Even if the plot is garbage, I can accept it if it is true to the nature of the author. When it is not, like with some parts of this story, I become ready to stop reading. I know the book has to progress, but why is the only idea the Collegium has for this type of situation to send a trainee away with his friends and one Herald? This seems completely uncharacteristic of the Heralds who are all about relying on each other and making thoughtful decisions. Speaking of which, are we even going to address how this series is called the "Collegium Chronicles" without focusing any attention on the changes necessary for the growing amount of chosen trainees? That would have been a better plot point than anything. Another direction for the story could have been on the circuit and dealing with outside towns who are questioning the city. I feel like I am reaching for straws trying to justify this mess of a plot. This is all without mentioning the "Bey ex machina" that came out of nowhere near the end. In reality, my main issue with the entire book is how not once, but TWICE the integrity of the Companions is called into question. Why won't the main characters, one of which is a master Bard and one WHO IS A FREAKING HERALD, trust their judgement about Bey? This is almost as bad as the second book when everyone turns on Mags when Dallen is hurt. They seem to just get washed aside to make room for more nonsense, insulting Lackey's original concept of the beautiful, unique creatures.
Finally, as with every book in this series, I have to nitpick the writing and editing. First, why can Lackey never pick up where the last book ends? Usually, if the story progresses and ends with enough cushion space for the next book to begin later, that works out. However, there is an awkward transition from the last book to the beginning of this, and this has been a consistent error from the beginning of the series. Second, and I hit on this issue before, but I wish Lackey would open a dictionary to look up synonyms for adjectives because the sentence structure and word variety is just bad. Reading "he supposed just some people just enjoyed..." or "he wore...tight embroidered cuffs and a high neck, also embroidered, with an embroidered placket..." distracts from immersing your reader. Honestly, I probably would have rage-quit this book if I read how so-and-so "echoed someone's thoughts" right after it was written or how Mags can do anything because he "has Bey's memories" again. Third, does Lackey think we are so illiterate that we need reminders of what she previously wrote? I don't need a literally copied section of the previous books to know what Mags is reflecting on. I skipped over at least 7 pages because I was so insulted that she would stoop to that level of lazy. Mags' story isn't that complex!!! Fourth, I am fine with descriptions, actually I really enjoy when they are detailed enough to picture, but there were some things that were obviously fluff. Why explain what the cafeteria looks like in the final book of the series when its the same as it has been and won't be visited in this book again? Why do I need a full-on explanation of the caravan when it really isn't used that much in the story? To me, this type of writing is like a desperate grab to hold the reader, but ultimately makes it skippable. Lastly, I don't care what anyone says, thoughts mid-sentence are dumb. When someone is talking and the reader is following the idea, the last thing you want to do as a writer is interrupt the sentence with some random thought. Sometimes, it is tolerable (for example, when Mags is thinking about food-Oh such delicious food!-and the random thought relates to it briefly), but overall it can wait to be made into another sentence or be placed at the end of the current one. I know writing is supposed to be fun and unique to the writer's personality, but I don't ever remember Lackey's work being this sloppy.
Believe it or not, with all of the above being said I would rank this book as my second or third favorite in the series (which really doesn't say a lot). What saves "Bastion" from being rated one star is how it began to remind me of Lackey's older Valdemar books. By moving the story from the Collegium to Mags' circuit, she moves the stagnant plot to familiar ground. I enjoyed exploring the Guard and country, visiting Waystations, and dealing with townsfolk because of when the story takes place in Valdemar's history. Finding an old vale-cave was very unlikely and a cop-out for something normal, but the simplistic journey was worth the read. Unfortunately, it was sandwiched between 100 pages of uneventful, motivation-less plot building and about 50 pages of hurrying up Mags' only character-defining backstory.
As I slogged through another Mags' book, I realized that I really didn't care about what happened because I know it will turn out fine. I guess I am just sad and very upset that I read five 300-page books with the potential to be a unique story about the rise of a Herald-spy with a mysterious background only to realize at the end that it was a disappointment.