Some good things, I guess. Kind of a mix of common sense, cliche, hyperbole, and watered down spirituality. I was asked to read it for work, otherwise this is not my type of book. It addresses 6 self-sabotaging attitudes and makes the claim that if you stop and think for 3 seconds, that’s all it takes to choose a better attitude and have a better life. The better attitudes are better attitudes. No argument there, but I don’t think I operate with these kind of whiny, complainy, immature impulses he’s trying to help me conquer. Each of the 6 impulses are described with a particular voice inside your head. They are 1. “There’s nothing I can do about it.” 2. “It’s too tough to try.” 3. “I’ll just do what comes my way.” 4. “I’ve done what’s required and that’s enough.” 5. “It’s not my problem, somebody else is to blame.” 6 “Someday I’ll get to that, but not now.” I’m not perfect. I can procrastinate or fail to make the most of every possible opportunity that comes my way, but in general, this is not the way I think or live my life.
The writing was repetitive. The 3 seconds was just chosen because it sounds good, I think. Why not 5 seconds or 3 minutes. What proof is there for 3 seconds? Hyperbole example: “Without vision, our zest for living dies and we wander, zombie-like, through our existence.” Really? Or how about this one? “When we fuel our passion..., That’s when we elevate our soul to greatness.” What does that even mean?
But, Parrot is known for being a Christian speaker, educator and author. So why is there so little mention of God or Jesus or prayer and how these affect our attitudes, behaviors and outcomes? In fact, when good things happen for us as a result of our writing down a list of our unattainable dreams, he says that “something happens in the cosmos,” which he calls The Law of Serendipity. “Plainly put, the Law of Serendipity is the experience of having two or more things happen coincidentally in a manner that is meaningful to the person experiencing them. It differs from coincidence in that serendipity implies not just a happenstance, but an underlying meaningful pattern.”
He does make some good points here and there, but to me it sounds like common sense or inspirational images you’d see on Facebook. I’d be interested to know other takes on this from people who did find his encouragement helpful. Also, let it be known that I read this on the plane after dropping my daughter off at college, so maybe I’m having a stronger reaction than it deserves. And I may be using this forum for an emotional release. (Probable.) I’ll be completing the end of book exercise for work and maybe I’ll come back and reread this and find my opinion has softened.