Is it possible that there are no coincidences?
- Mel Gibson as Graham Hess, from M. Night Shyamalan's film Signs (2002)
All of her life, however, Molly had believed that there were no coincidences.
- Dean Koontz, The Taking (2004)
Yes, Dean Koontz's 2004 novel The Taking is a pretty blatant ripoff of M. Night Shyamalan's excellent 2002 film Signs, having near-exact quotes, like the one above, from the film, as well as individual scenes, like the one from the film where the wife is dying with Mel Gibson nearby, and as she's dying she says something that seems nonsensical at the time but that years later turns out to have significance and relevance in future events. This happens in The Taking as well, except it's a kid dying in another kid's arms that utters the prophetic phrase, and of course Koontz changed what it was, and etc. The nature of the aliens are also identical in both works, with the aliens not doing a direct invasion involving millions of aliens and ground combat, but merely hiding in the shadows and infiltrating our planet in small numbers, more felt and sensed by the people around than ever seen directly.
So, what was good about The Taking? Well, the short chapters and the book being broken down into seven parts were welcome structural changes from the agonizingly-long chapters of 30-40 pages that I've encountered in most other Koontz books I've read to this point. So I really appreciated that change by Koontz; it made this longer entry of his an easier book to read. I also liked how the book started out. It had a pervading sense of dread that was pretty effective, and there was one particularly tense and terrifying confrontation between one of the protagonists (Molly) and her father that affected me quite a bit! I was unsettled by it, even after I had stopped reading and put the book down that day.
But that's about it. On to the bad things about this book, which unfortunately there are plenty of.
The book is just way too long, plain and simple. It drags like you would not believe, and at least a hundred pages (probably more) of it is just superfluous filler/padding. The book itself highlights how overwritten it is when, on page 347, Molly looks at her wristwatch and reflects on how she first saw the alien rain just ten hours earlier. Yes...this book took 347 pages to advance the story just ten hours of a single day. That's crazy.
The scene with Molly on the tavern stairs leading to the basement and cellar, which started on page 313, is a good example of how badly this book drags. She didn't leave the stairs until page 330. So you're talking about a scene where Molly is just standing on the stairs for almost twenty pages. It felt like it took an eternity to get through those pages. I wish I could say that was the only such example, but unfortunately Koontz's books are absolutely littered with such scenes. Like in The Mask, where I swear to God there was a scene of like ten or fifteen pages where a guy was just climbing up onto his roof to make sure his TV antenna was securely attached because he thought it was loose and was making noise...
Yeah.
Another thing I hated was how much of a missed opportunity this book was. Most of the book was taken up by Molly's dull quest to save the town of Black Lake's few children, which, given Koontz's constant telling to the reader how godly powerful the alien invaders are (they can move through walls and even cement, and are immune to gunfire), seems like the most pointless task ever (because they're obviously just going to die like everyone else? so why bother?). It just seemed to me like in a 410-page novel about an alien invasion and the world being on the brink of complete annihilation that the story could have focused on something a bit more exciting than this.
To this point, on page 170, an epic villain, Molly's father Michael Render, confronts Molly, and the aforementioned bone-chilling scene involving him plays out, with his backstory also being described. But then he completely disappears from the story? And I mean completely...until page 381, just under thirty pages before the end of the book. And how things ended with him was just lame, and felt rushed. This book should have been written as a Molly vs. Michael Render cat-and-mouse, maybe survival horror type of story, maybe mixed in with some scenes of locals getting into shootouts with alien scouting parties; that would have been sooo good. But we got the story we got, and Michael Render was completely wasted, great villain that he was.
There were also too many types of aliens in this story. Red, winged flying ones with long claws, strange ones made out of collections of white sacs that inflate and deflate and that scurry around, giant insects the size of an entire basement, strange humanoid ETs that have two arms and two legs but an otherwise alien appearance, and so on and so forth. It lacked focus, and it seemed like Koontz was just throwing everything and the kitchen sink into the story.
This also happened when the UFO was finally revealed. It was pure nonsense. Koontz couldn't figure out what he wanted it to look like, to differentiate it from the countless Hollywood alien invasion movies, so he made it look like everything he could possibly think of in his mind, making it sound ridiculous and unrealistic. Millions of people's faces are in the sides of it, there are spikes on some parts of it, scales on other parts of it. It sounds like a figure from a surrealist painting by Salvador Dali...except not good, like Dali. More...dumb? Laughable? Yeah. Both of those.
And so many things were left unexplained by the end of this book, including some pretty big parts of the story. Like how the hell did the dogs have the ability to open doors with their minds? Do they have magical powers? Are they possessed by the aliens or by some religious entity? And what was their purpose in helping Molly find and protect the children for pretty much this entire book? Why did they do it? The dogs were a huge part of this story, and their nature and motives were left largely unexplained by the end of this book. Nevermind the fact that the reasoning behind everything the aliens ever do in this book, an even more critical part of the story, is never explained either. These holes make the book seem really incomplete, and I was very disappointed in the overall experience as a result.
Finally, the story has a heavily religious ending that essentially ruins the entire book and directly insults science and astrophysics. Koontz says that astrophysicists "tell us" that black holes are "most likely doorways between universes", which is patently false. Maybe in Koontz's extremely broken interpretation of modern science they say that, but not in the real world. What an unbelievably idiotic thing to say. I mean...I don't even know what to say to that. It might be the single stupidest thing I've ever read in a book, ever.
In the end, Signs did it better. So much better. If you haven't seen that movie and you're even remotely into alien invasion stories, you're missing out in a big way, and I highly recommend checking that movie out. The Taking, though? Not so much. It was pretty bad.
CAWPILE rating:
Characters: 6.5
Atmosphere / Setting: 3.5
Writing Style: 4.5
Plot: 3.5
Intrigue: 4.5
Logic / Relationships: 2.0
Enjoyment: 4.0
= 28.5 total
÷ 7 categories = 4.07 out of 10
= 2 stars