What do you think?
Rate this book


Hardcover
First published January 1, 1983





Uncertain how many stars to award; 2-3. (I lean toward one, then toward the other.) I liked it well enough, for the most part. Some paragraphs I skipped b/c the info was going into detail I didn't need. Whole lists of names I skipped. Skipped a few pages toward the end where it turns into basically a transcript of testimony, no diff. from other forced testimonies provided in previous sections.
A lot of this book I found to be hilarious. I mean, this is a whole pile of assholes in here. Full-on petulant, temper-tantrum throwing, lying, whiny, assholes. Some, like Frank, are the kind to pick fights & let other people finish them. I don't know if there is still anyone walking around w/ the delusion that Frank was a nice guy; a real swell kind of chap. I certainly was under no such illusion when I started this, so I had no kind of bubble here to be burst. Regardless, I was still surprised at the extent to which these people not only behaved, but were allowed to behave by entire societies & countries. Frank basically wanted to be some of dictator of his own universe. I don't believe he was manic-depressive, either. I really think that's looking for excuses. Seems more that affluenza (read: spoiled asshole) was his affliction. What a freaking man-baby. His upbringing created an entitled mama's boy, & adult fame only served to over-inflate a fragile ego. These assholes are everywhere. Frank just had the insulation to prop his up.
The research in here is well-done. There are references included, if anyone cared enough to track down & verify her info. I didn't, but I don't actually care, either. I already knew he was a prick. The level of racism & misogyny, the belittlement, the mistreatment of others...it's really something. He was one of those kind that doesn't do anything not in his own interest. Charity is almost always for public image, but that's an old play by celebrities. Smaller acts of unpublicized charity were so over the top they're more in line w/ the way he publicly over-spent & lavished gifts on pet people in order to cement his image as a big man, both to himself as well as to others. He seems a sociopath, but one w/ money, not smarts (& definitely not patience). (Also, I'm just wondering, these less public, supposedly private gifts to strangers.....if they were so benevolently & humbly given, how is it they were even known about in the 1st place? I don't buy it. Certainly not when viewed in light of everything else.)
Anyway, I liked it, & I don't doubt at least most of it is accurate. However, it was a lot of info. to take in. I was never really bored, but I did sometimes question how it was that I wasn't farther along in the text, w/ all the reading I'd done. My version had small type, so that was some of it. I was most thoroughly amused in the 1st part of the book, b/c these people are nuts. Later, when it gets into his political butt-kissing, I was less interested. I'd mostly read a lot of that before in other texts about a lot of the same players that are also involved here. That's not the author's fault. It's just info. I already had. I still learned, though. I also had mad respect for Australia. I wished they'd have taken it further & forced him to his knees. He should have been kicked out of his hotel, & denied all transport or sustenance. (Walk, then swim, motherfucker, if you can't apologize. Hope you know which roadside plants are safe to eat.) Still, I think they're fabulous for standing up the entitled bully. Good for you, Australia. If only more of the world stood up to assholes, maybe we could have nice things one day.
This is no small, light book. If you are down with that, then go ahead & give this a go. I don't recommend it for anyone that idolizes Frank & thinks he's a stand-up guy, though. The let-down would be severe, & painful. Most of the world, those who don't live under rocks, anyway, should be fine.