The book first describes Wesley use of the term Christian Perfection, share some anecdotes of those living and then dying in this states, a dozen pages of poetry, some questions and objections answered, a section on aphorisms, and the last couple of sections, the best writing on topic with conclusions and distinctions on the term Christian Perfection.
This is Wesley account on the term he describes as Christian Perfection. He constantly clarifies the term by saying what it is not, for example, someone in the state of Christian Perfection is not free from mistake, temptation, or suffering. Christian Perfection is more like a state of being completely free from sin and any desires or motives that are not God’s; and accepting God’s will for whatever circumstances one may be in. The constant redefinition of the term in his writing suggest that this concept was either controversial to his audience OR Wesley could have used a better term to describe what appears to me a clean conscience and confession of all sin by the individual. In the middle of the book he gives the definition:
“1. That Christian perfection is that love of God and our neighbor, which implies deliverance from all sin.
2. That this is received merely by faith.
3. That it is given instantaneously, in one moment.
4. That we are to expect it, not at death, but every moment; that now is the accepted time, now is the day of this salvation.”
The issue with Wesly on this term is the idea of perfection typically used to describe a completed, static, finished state of the perfect object; whereas the Christian life is constantly striving towards this goal, and anyone saying they are perfect atomically brings a judgmental examination by others who almost definitely could bring up a mistake or fault. The idea of going in and out of a state of perfection does disservice to the term. It is this equivocation of this term Perfect between Wesley and the general public’s common everyday usage really could be cleaned up if Wesley used a better term for his idea. The unorganized structure of the book does little to help his cause. In the aphorisms section, Wesley states some good common sense ideals and applications of NT teaching, warns against Antinomian books and Solifidianism. Which is interesting in that he believes Christian perfection is only by faith, but salvation is more than faith alone? To be fair to Wesley, I do not know how he is using the term Solifidianism, the historical context, and what all ‘by faith alone’ means. It’s on my radar now for future reading/research.