What do you think?
Rate this book


655 pages, Paperback
First published September 1, 1992
So to be fair to Brady, his biography is a respectable work of research. Brady has a good eye for useful detail. Put together with some of the blind spots Bogdanovich himself acknowledges in the introduction to This Is Orson Welles, the two books help make some sense of one of the most maligned and entertainingly evasive artists of our time.
Count my grandparents--whom I love--among those who thought Orson Welles didn't play fair. I heard about "The War of the Worlds" broadcast from them before I ever saw Citizen Kane. Welles was one of many celebrities who wasn't "nice."
Brady focuses on more than manners, more than 'Kane.' While Welles the director may have been what mattered most to Welles himself, the topic can't be discussed without an in-depth look at how the sub-topics of radio broadcaster, theatrical director, stage actor, screen actor, magician, pundit and film editor all contributed to the autuer. Brady's research on all of Welles' work supports and goes beyond that of Welles himself. For example, Brady writes about Welles early radio and theater work, "One of the problems Welles had to confront from the very beginning...was caused by his overinvolvement in so many projects and his procrastination" (147). While overinvolved, Welles would imbue his works with a worldview that was present at least as early as his stage production of Julius Caesar in which Welles played Brutus, a good man of principle, "committed to the demands of his conscience but somewhat bewildered" by how to respond to crisis (124). Brady then quotes Welles himself:
"[Brutus is] the classical picture of the eternal, impotent, ineffectual, fumbling liberal, the reformer who wants to do something about things but doesn't know how....He's dead right all the time--and dead by the final curtain. He's Shakespeare's favorite hero--the fellow who thinks the times are out of joint, but who's really out of joint with his time." (124)Welles not only describes much of his approach to Shakespeare but to many of his characters: Charlie Kane, Mike Vargas, Jake Hannaford. These are the despicable idealists he would later tell Bogdanovich about.
While more than one critic has commented on Citizen Kane' s similarity to Mr. Arkadin, no one has yet linked 'Arkadin' to Welles' radio production of Archibald MacLeish's The Fall of the City. While Brady correctly on the play's "symphonic effect," will revolutionize movies as "sound montage" in Citizen Kane, Brady's block quotes also capture the critique of fascism:
The city of masterless menWhat is striking in Brady's choice of quotes is how well they support the theory that Welles dramatized post-modern indeterminacy before academics rendered it in their less dramatic opacity. Welles and MacLeish, on the radio risked it when the city's conqueror arrives and lifts the visor of his helmet:
will take a master.
There sill be shouting then:
Blood after! (108)
There is no one.It might as well be the cockpit of Arkadin's plane or Thompson's literal definition of Rosebud. The richness of Brady's research makes a web of nearly inexplicable connections far beyond the tired one of Hearst, Hearst, Hearst. As implied by Brady's title, Welles himself is the media giant, too mulit-faceted to be defined; the idealist corrupted.
No one at all.
No one.
The helmet is hollow.
The metal is empty.
The armor is empty.
I tell you there is no
one at all there. (108)
Just when we thought Netflix had advanced studies of Welles with the release of The Other Side of the Wind, they follow up with Mank David Fincher's half-bright biopic, which at best dramatizes Hearst's fake news of Upton Sinclair's and at worst perpetuates the long-discredited Pauline Kael theory that Welles had nothing to do with Citizen Kane's screenplay (irony of irony: Fincher steals Joseph Mankiewicz' propaganda against Sinclair and attributes it to his brother Herman, who is Kael's creator of 'Kane' ... which she labeled a "shallow masterpiece," anyway). Any book or movie about Welles that discusses W.R. Hearst as the sole model for Charles Foster Kane or Marion Davies as the sole model for Susan Alexander Kane is at best third-rate. By mentioning farm machinery heir Harold McCormick and second-wife Ganna Walska, who sang at the Chicago Civic Opera, Brady does some heavy-lifting, that if Citizen Kane is a roman a clef, then the sources were many,--like Kane himself--too diverse to be summed up by something as simple as "a sled" or "W.R. Hearst" (230-263).
If Brady's book has a flaw, it is that Welles has been prolific since his death. The Murch re-edit of Touch of Evil, the digital restorations of the sound quality of Chimes at Midnight and release of The Other Side of the Wind continue to prompt reassessments of Welles' work. Citizen Welles is as good a primer for Welles' current Act IV as there is. Act V could include The Deep, The Merchant of Venice, Treasure Island, The Dreamers and perhaps even restorations of The Magnificent Ambersons and The Lady from Shanghai.
Gad, what a drive. I prayed for a policeman. Six feet four and 250 pounds, and what seemed like six hands in my shirt. All he kept saying was, "Oh, the beauty of it. Oh, the beauty of it." In tears of rage I finally shoved him out at Sunset Boulevard, threw my tattered bra in the gutter, and gunned up the hill to home and Mother. Poor Orson. I always wondered how long it took him to get a cab.