Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Elegy for Theory

Rate this book
Rhetorically charged debates over theory have divided scholars of the humanities for decades. In Elegy for Theory, D. N. Rodowick steps back from well-rehearsed arguments pro and con to assess why theory has become such a deeply contested concept. Far from lobbying for a return to the “high theory” of the 1970s and 1980s, he calls for a vigorous dialogue on what should constitute a new, ethically inflected philosophy of the humanities.

Rodowick develops an ambitiously cross-disciplinary critique of theory as an academic discourse, tracing its historical displacements from ancient concepts of theoria through late modern concepts of the aesthetic and into the twentieth century. The genealogy of theory, he argues, is constituted by two main lines of descent—one that goes back to philosophy and the other rooted instead in the history of positivism and the rise of the empirical sciences. Giving literature, philosophy, and aesthetics their due, Rodowick asserts that the mid-twentieth-century rise of theory within the academy cannot be understood apart from the emergence of cinema and visual studies. To ask the question, “What is cinema?” is to also open up in new ways the broader question of what is art.

At a moment when university curriculums are everywhere being driven by scientism and market forces, Elegy for Theory advances a rigorous argument for the importance of the arts and humanities as transformative, self-renewing cultural legacies.

304 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 2014

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

D.N. Rodowick

13 books12 followers
David Norman Rodowick is the Glen A. Lloyd Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago. He is the author of many books, including The Virtual Life of Film and Gilles Deleuze’s Time Machine.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (25%)
4 stars
6 (37%)
3 stars
3 (18%)
2 stars
2 (12%)
1 star
1 (6%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for $am.
32 reviews3 followers
February 12, 2026
overall very good and clarifying, but this stylistic tic of Rodowick begin to wear on me by the end: everything is always numerically delineated. there will be two moments inspired by a theory, and thrn each of those will contain within it a list of a number of consequences, and so on and so on. it gets quite repetitive.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews